Ok Guys......Opinions Please

**juliosz** · #1 12-11-2007, 04:26 AM

A friend of mine is interested in this car: 70 RS Z w/Air My opinion of the car is yes it could possibly be a real 70 Z w/factory air but unless you have some bullet proof documentation to prove that, it will always be questioned. What do you guys think?

**juliosz** · #2 12-11-2007, 04:29 AM

Oh, and also if it was a factory job, would it have some sort of unique prefix for the engine build code?

**Xplantdad** · #3 12-11-2007, 04:36 AM

I don't know about 70 Z28's but shouldn't it have a 12 bolt?

Looks like a lot of work...

As far as a Z28 with AC...I have no clue...though I thought they never came with it...the whole solid lifter-high revving engine reason...

dkatap · #4 12-11-2007, 04:47 AM

It is missing everything a real Z28 should have except emblems, and they are in the wrong locations.
Dennis

**juliosz** · #5 12-11-2007, 04:59 AM

Yeah, just got a good look at the pics and you're right, not much correct there....wrong tach, etc. Looks like possibly a trim tag mistake, not about the AC but the Z28.

**JRSully** · #6 12-11-2007, 05:05 AM

I thought 73 was the first year for A/C in a Z.?

69LM1 · #7 12-11-2007, 05:13 AM

Correct. 73 was first year for air. 70 was first year for auto, last year for 12 bolt.

That car has been listed several times.

Not a real Z IMHO,

Rich

akcamaro · #8 12-11-2007, 05:33 AM

The car has been discused, and torn apart, here.
http://www.nastyz28.com/forum/showthread.php?t=105627
to summarize; Faked tag, and lacking all the Z stuff (8K tach, floor mount gas pedal, rear "bummper-etes", 12 bolt) and it shouldn't have A/C.

GTO_DON · #9 12-11-2007, 05:36 AM

somebody definetly embossed that tag!!!

DarrenX33 · #10 12-11-2007, 05:23 PM

[ QUOTE ]
somebody definetly embossed that tag!!!

[/ QUOTE ]

AND HOW! It would have been more convincing written in crayola.