Dedicated to the Promotion and Preservation of American Muscle Cars, Dealer built Supercars and COPO cars. | 
	
		
			
  | 
	|||||||
| Register | Album Gallery | Thread Gallery | FAQ | Community | Calendar | Become a Paid Member | Today's Posts | Search | 
 
 | 
	
	
| 
		 | 
	Thread Tools | Display Modes | 
| 
		 
			 
			#1  
			
			
			
			
			
		 
		
	 | 
|||
		
		
  | 
|||
| 
		
	
		
		
			
			 
			
			Considering building a sort of "pro touring" style car out of my 69 RS.Wondering what rear end to use between a Dana 60 and a 9 inch Ford.You see the 9 inch used all the time and occasionally the Dana.Does one have a advantage or disadvantage over the other and exactly what if so? Thanks in advance 
		
		
		
		
		
		
			
				__________________ 
		
		
		
		
		
	
	EX 81 YENKO TURBO Z owner  | 
| 
		 
			 
			#2  
			
			
			
			
			
		 
		
	 | 
|||
		
		
  | 
|||
| 
		
	
		
		
			
			 
			
			I would run the 9". Easy to change pumpkins and I think the Dana 60 is a bigger, heavier unit that takes more hp to turn it. 
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
	
	 | 
| 
		 
			 
			#3  
			
			
			
			
			
		 
		
	 | 
|||
		
		
  | 
|||
| 
		
	
		
		
			
			 
			
			I agree. The Dana is a heavy piece. 
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
	
	 | 
| 
		 
			 
			#4  
			
			
			
			
			
		 
		
	 | 
||||
		
		
  | 
||||
| 
		
	
		
		
			
			 
			
			Concur with Charley.  Dana 60s are nearly indestructible tho. 
		
		
		
		
		
		
			
				__________________ 
		
		
		
		
		
	
	Sam... ![]()  | 
| 
		 
			 
			#5  
			
			
			
			
			
		 
		
	 | 
|||
		
		
  | 
|||
| 
		
	
		
		
			
			 
			
			Thanks guys,I was just wondering as there is a pretty nice 69 Camaro on ebay right now with a Dana and i had one sitting in storage so i thought id ask. A 9 inch it is !  
		
		
		
		
		
		
			![]() 
				__________________ 
		
		
		
		
		
	
	EX 81 YENKO TURBO Z owner  | 
| 
		 
			 
			#6  
			
			
			
			
			
		 
		
	 | 
|||
		
		
  | 
|||
| 
		
	
		
		
			
			 
			
			A ford part will slow your gm down, a mopar part will make it faster.   
		
		
		
		
		
		
			 .......    Seriously though, I've got a 4.10 dana 60 in my 'Cuda and I must say, it is definately without a doubt one tough s.o.b.  It laughs at 6K clutch dumps.    I would run a dana 60.
				__________________ 
		
		
		
		
		
	
	Andy 1967 Camaro 406 4 speed 1969 C/10 383 5 speed 1969 D300 318 4 speed 1969 Super Bee 383 4 speed 1972 K/5 350 Turbo 350 1972 Duster 340 727 1974 'Cuda 340 4 speed  | 
| 
		 
			 
			#7  
			
			
			
			
			
		 
		
	 | 
|||
		
		
  | 
|||
| 
		
	
		
		
			
			 
			
			I agree with the above posts, but if you're not going to be changing gears, and want a bullet proof setup, I would go with a properly built Dana 60. You won't kill it. 
		
		
		
		
		
		
			
				__________________ 
		
		
		
		
		
	
	Dean  | 
| 
		 
			 
			#8  
			
			
			
			
			
		 
		
	 | 
|||
		
		
  | 
|||
| 
		
	
		
		
			
			 
			
			A Pro-touring style car won't hook up to where he would ever need a Dana though. I have two cars with 6 speed and 389 geared 9" rears and they have been fine. 
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
	
	 | 
| 
		 
			 
			#9  
			
			
			
			
			
		 
		
	 | 
|||
		
		
  | 
|||
| 
		
	
		
		
			
			 
			
			Darn it guys knock it off,you gonna make me flip a coin! 
		
		
		
		
		
		
			
				__________________ 
		
		
		
		
		
	
	EX 81 YENKO TURBO Z owner  | 
| 
		 
			 
			#10  
			
			
			
			
			
		 
		
	 | 
|||
		
		
  | 
|||
| 
		
	
		
		
			
			 
			
			No experience with a pro touring set up but years ago ran both set ups in a 70 chevy 454 ls6 mud bogger. Bottom line I could break the 9 inch and did many times but could not break the dana.If it took extra HP to drive it I never noticed. 
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
	
	Dana looks better also and gets more conversation especially from the hemi guys trying to figure out what it was out of. Take care  | 
![]()  | 
	
	
		
		
  | 
	
		
  |