Why no L35 in 1970? - The Supercar Registry

#21

11-02-2006, 12:25 AM

olredalert olredalert is offline

Yenko Contributing Member

Join Date: Dec 2002

Location: Marine City, Mi.

Posts: 9,454

Thanks: 33,234

Thanked 4,603 Times in 1,945 Posts

Re: Why no L35 in 1970?

-----The problem I see with your thought, Sam, is that Chevrolet never advertised the 402s as 402s. If Chevrolet division wanted to keep up with the Joneses they would have advertised them as the cubic inches they really had not as 396s. This isnt to say I have any posative input because I dont. I have wondered about the reason for those extra 6 cubic inches for a long time as well.........Bill S

« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts BB code is On Smilies are On [IMG] code is On HTML code is Off Forum Rules

Forum Jump

All times are GMT. The time now is 03:46 PM.

Dedicated to the Promotion and Preservation of American Muscle Cars, Dealer built Supercars and COPO cars.