![]() Dedicated to the Promotion and Preservation of American Muscle Cars, Dealer built Supercars and COPO cars. |
|
Register | Album Gallery | Thread Gallery | FAQ | Community | Calendar | Become a Paid Member | Today's Posts | Search |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Question I have is why would someone do that?
Paul
__________________
70 Camaro LA Z-28 03B Citrus Green LT-1 M-40 3.73's 69 Camaro X-77 Z-28 10C Cortez Silver M-21 3.73's Deluxe Project X - SOLD 69 Camaro X-77 Z-28 01B Garnet Red w/Black top, M-20 3.73 Deluxe Houndstooth |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
It's fun to imagine things about something when we never seen anyting like it before and doubt it but i really think it's legit.I have the engine in my shop and i think it's factory.One of the things people are focusing on is the casting date,the date is one of if not the earliest seen for an 854 block .While the date is odd the hyphen is odd also and it's not like someone put one there after the block was cast, that was there when the block was born. I asked your opinions and im getting them and appreciate them but as of right now im taking this block at face value ,a 68 Chevelle 375/396.This thing was in a race car or in a race shop corner before most people ever cared about numbers matching. It also came from Texas in case you live there and are missing the original engine in your 68 Chevelle.It came from Texas 3 years ago and was in a Fiat drag car,before that.Thanks guys
__________________
EX 81 YENKO TURBO Z owner |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
[ QUOTE ]
It's fun to imagine things about something when we never seen anyting like it before and doubt it but i really think it's legit....... [/ QUOTE ] No '854 block was made in 1967. It doesn't get any clearer than that. We are talking about two years before the '854 block went into production. It was merely a .030 over bore to the 396 anyway, so why do a early prototype for that. While on that topic ( the bore ), check to see if it is a 402 as it should be. It it measures standard bore, you got something here. But I sincerely doubt it. I hope he doesn't think we ganged-up on him or anything. Steve
__________________
![]() |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
There are still heads on it so i have not idea what the bore is at this time,i'll keep digging!
__________________
EX 81 YENKO TURBO Z owner |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I dont think anyone is ganging up on me but i do think back a few years ago when i drug home a pretty rough 81 Camaro out of a towing yard in California.That was when i located this site and had several nay sayers as it had a early build date ect ect.Come to find out it wasnt just a Yenko car it was one of the 2 or 3 prototype of the 18 Yenko Turbo Z cars.I learned long ago with this car stuff never say never.Id like an expert opinion on that front pad and broach marks and the stampings. Thanks again guys
__________________
EX 81 YENKO TURBO Z owner |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
The partial VIN stamp looks all wrong. The one (1) has no foot, the three (3) has a rounded top, the nine (9) has an open top, the four (4) is closed. I've enclosed a picture of a 1969 stamp found on ebay (credit for picture goes to original poster). I really do not think they changed the font style.
No 854 block in 1967. Rick H. ![]() ![]() |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I have atleast 2 more 854 blocks back in storage i will check and compare.I also have a 66 961 block i will compare to see if fonts changed , Thats for the opinion
__________________
EX 81 YENKO TURBO Z owner |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Back to ricks454 question if they ground off a 0 they sure did a wicked nice job textureizing(sp?)the block back to bare cast!?
__________________
EX 81 YENKO TURBO Z owner |
![]() |
|
|