Go Back   The Supercar Registry > General Discussion > Supercar/Musclecar Discussion


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 05-07-2004, 05:03 AM
RichSchmidt RichSchmidt is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Northern NJ
Posts: 620
Thanks: 5
Thanked 43 Times in 29 Posts
Default Re: Is a "Clone' better?

If course everybody wants an original one,,but since just about every one of these cars is accounted for in some form or another,the only way to get the Yenko experiance is to either pay top dollar for one of the existing ones,or build one yourself.I know the owners of the last survivours would object to the fact that you can duplacte the original car except for the actual numbers,and somehow that makes their cars less valuable,but the fact is that not everybody wants the real deal.Some cant afford it,and others shouldnt be trusted with it.
Now lets put this into perspective.What would be a nicer car to have for the street if you had about 50 grand to spend?That clone camaro,or a real yenko copo car that has been in a barn for 30 years,but now has a dana 60 under the rear,an LS7 tunnel ramed engine under the glass nose and a doug nash 5 sped in it along with glass doors and a tub job?How about of the real deal car had no title and the owner told you flat out that he was the one who dumped the grenaded original 427 and 4 speed into the metal shredder at the scrap yard 30 years ago.Would the fact that it's VIN number appears on the registry of real COPO cars make it a better deal for the same price as the clone?Since about half of all original 69 COPO cars ended up as the example I described,and about half of all the correct survivous are actually rehabed race cars with restamped engines and questionable date codes on the rest of the parts,can you blame a guy for just wanting to build his own?
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 05-07-2004, 07:46 AM
camarojoe's Avatar
camarojoe camarojoe is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: PA
Posts: 5,306
Thanks: 239
Thanked 269 Times in 120 Posts
Default Re: Is a "Clone' better?

Rich, i understand 100% what you are saying... for years I had considered selling my fully restored, fully functional, running, driving Yenko Camaro clone to buy a basketcase "real" supercar of some sort that I would probably STILL not have enough money to buy outright, plus throw 1000's and 1000's of dollars worth of parts at, not to mention the YEARS of time and effort it would take me to ever get it to the condition the clone I would have sold was already! Sure, my car is not a real Yenko Camaro, but it wasn't easy or cheap to build it either. After years of hard work, its finished, and I can take it out and enjoy it any time i want to. There's alot to be said about that. I have a "real" Deuce now too, but I still enjoy my camaro, real or not.

Attached Images
 
__________________
Joe Barr
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 05-07-2004, 09:23 AM
427TJ's Avatar
427TJ 427TJ is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: PNW
Posts: 5,578
Thanks: 1,007
Thanked 293 Times in 163 Posts
Default Re: Is a "Clone' better?

Hey guys, I heard a funny one just this afternoon:

"Arguing on the Internet is like the Special Olympics--even if you win you're still retarded."

(No offense to retarded/mentally challenged/differently abled/learning disabled/ADD afflicted people or their family members or anyone else anywhere in any way. It's just a joke.)
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 05-07-2004, 05:10 PM
gemleeus gemleeus is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: marietta, ga.
Posts: 340
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default Re: Is a "Clone' better?

i would rather have the one thats been in the barn for 30 years
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 05-08-2004, 07:01 AM
NCGuy68 NCGuy68 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: N. Carolina, Wake Co.
Posts: 677
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Default Re: Is a "Clone' better?

Gents,

A clone is a clone period!

Enough said!
__________________
Craig S.
"I saw Elvis At 1000 Feet"
John Force.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 05-09-2004, 03:54 AM
Unreal Unreal is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Chattanooga, TN, USA
Posts: 1,335
Thanks: 1
Thanked 77 Times in 48 Posts
Default Re: Is a "Clone' better?

Wow
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 05-09-2004, 08:22 AM
KLONECO KLONECO is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 294
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default Re: Is a "Clone' better?

YES THEY ARE!!!...........and if a person enjoys em!........so be it!!!!!DO YOU HAVE A PROBLEM WITH THAT? yea I did not think so!!!( fake ss,z28,ls6's are everywhere!)ton's or them have sprouted up for years now .......all of a sudden it is an issue! I BELIEVE IT IS A TRIBUTE TO THE SPORT ..THE LEGEND.... THE MUSCLE CAR GUYS! keeps another one out of the junkyard!
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 05-09-2004, 03:59 PM
Dave Rifkin Dave Rifkin is offline
Yenko Contributing Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Little Egg Harbor, NJ, USA
Posts: 2,210
Thanks: 14,056
Thanked 347 Times in 178 Posts
Default Re: Is a "Clone' better?

I don't post here often but this is a subject I have an opinion on; first of all everyone needs to understand that not everyone can afford to own the real thing. If they choose to build, or buy, a clone so that they might enjoy the thrill of driving a representation of their dream car so be it. They aren't hurting anyone, at least until they try to sell the car as legitimate.
For myself, I would love to own any one of the cars owned by the members on this site but will never have that kind of money. So I just might have to build a clone of a Yenko Camaro or maybe a cloned Hertz Shelby. Either way, it will be for my enjoyment alone and if anyone has a problem with that it's their problem, not mine.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 05-09-2004, 11:22 PM
MosportGreen66's Avatar
MosportGreen66 MosportGreen66 is offline
Yenko Contributing Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: NY, NY
Posts: 8,721
Thanks: 1,090
Thanked 1,039 Times in 462 Posts
Default Re: Is a "Clone' better?

[ QUOTE ]
i would rather have the one thats been in the barn for 30 years

[/ QUOTE ]

Original / Survivors is what I have come to love. Far and few between!
__________________
Follow me on Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/mbcgarage/
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 05-10-2004, 08:26 PM
jus4funn68 jus4funn68 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 97
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default Re: Is a "Clone' better?

Ive stayed out of this myself but I do have an interesting observation. Most of the people unhappy with the clone situation is Chevy folks. Ive noticed at a lot of cruisein's and car shows you will see bunches of the Shelby Cobra clones, but no one seems to complain about those. I personally love to see the real cars. When I see a nice looking car and then Im told it is a clone, I quickly lose interest. I may never have a Yenko, Motion, Nickey, or Dana but that doesnt stop me from admiring them. If someone wants to have a car to give them that feeling so be it, but trying to pass it off as genuine is the only problem. It does devalue the genuine article. It is fraud even it you did just want to get close to a dream. JMO
__________________
--------------------------------------------------
68SS Camaro L-78
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 06:54 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.

O Garage vBulletin Plugins by Drive Thru Online, Inc.