What do you think about this trade?

[skierkaj]

Here's a pic of my interior . . .

[TDW]

I took a quick look at the AMC pics. The underhood and interior shots show some pretty sloppy workmanship. I would think long and hard about a car like that. Would pass on it myself.

[Dave Rifkin]

No offense but that AMC looks like a real turd compared to your Camaro. If you want more balls for your car swap in a 350 or a stroker. I'd pass on that AMC for sure.

[Charley Lillard]

If you are bored,just put a more ballsy engine in your Camaro.

[Allen]

[ QUOTE ]
No offense but that AMC looks like a real turd compared to your Camaro. If you want more balls for your car swap in a 350 or a stroker. I'd pass on that AMC for sure.

[/ QUOTE ]

I agree 100%. There is no way I'd give up that Camaro for one of those. The Camaro looks way better, and go-fast parts are easy to swap in there. If you traded, you'd be taking a giant leap backwards, and would probably regret it later.



Allen (parial to 2nd gen. Camaros, and had a 75, 77, and 78 Z-28 Camaro at one time or another to keep the Nova company over the years)

[jg95z28]

Keep the Camaro. If the Javelin was as clean as your Camaro, then I'd consider it, but that AMC is a BEAST!

[skierkaj]

Thanks for the opinions guys . . . It made me realize that I wasn't thinking too clearly.

Does anyone know where I can get my hands on a '69 Camaro? I know it's stereotypical, but I really want a '69. A 4 speed would be cool in that!

I am somewhat bored with my car, and it's due to the lack of horsepower. Suffised to say, I have absolutely no money to beef up my Camaro (It all went to the looks); all show and no go.

Quite some time ago I missed out on an auction for a '69, I think the price was around $3800, and it was even in Wisconsin! I had just bought my car at the time, and there was no way my mother would let me have 2 cars, so I missed out. Here's some pics of it . . .

[skierkaj]

another pic