Dedicated to the Promotion and Preservation of American Muscle Cars, Dealer built Supercars and COPO cars. |
|
|||||||
| Register | Album Gallery | Thread Gallery | FAQ | Community | Calendar | Become a Paid Member | Today's Posts | Search |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#11
|
||||
|
||||
|
Valve usage is not consistent between Norwood and Van Nuys either. There is no completely logical pattern based on CRG data collection. Chevrolet literature says one thing and data says something else.
|
| The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to 1967Z28 For This Useful Post: | ||
|
#12
|
||||
|
||||
|
Ask Mike Gibbons. Is it even necessary. 🤷
__________________
Richard 1967 Camaro SS 396/375 4K 2002 Camaro 35 Anniversay Z4C-WU8 |
|
#13
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
The November 69 Chevrolet Service News quoted in John Z's CRG report was specifically about the 70 Nova with Disc Brakes. CSN called it a Pressure Regulating Valve. It prevented the rear brakes from locking up. Eddie, The Pressure Regulating Valve (3982304) was used on all 70 Novas with Disc/Drum brakes. The valve was on the subframe from the first part of 70 production. Later production is was under the master cylinder. While researching this I noticed that the Camaro valve (3908326) looks just like 3982304. Parts books states that it was for: 67 with AC, (not sure why) 67-69 396 Except 4 Wheel Disc Brake, 68-69 350 Except 4 Wheel Disc Brake, 68-69 327 w/4-Speed Except 4 Wheel Disc Brake, This would indicate that the cars came standard with Disc/Drum should get it. This was safety feature after all. Not only did the Nova get it in 70, but so did the Chevelle w/Disc Brakes. There were two Chevelle designs. JL8 Z's wouldn't need it. 12 bolts axles generally went on cars with front disc bakes. Maybe the 302 in the Z did not necessitate such lockup protection. Other than that, it is a mystery why there is no completely logical pattern based on CRG data collection. Greg.
__________________
Nova Research Project at chevynova.org |
|
#14
|
|||
|
|||
|
There's more under this link:
https://www.camaros.org/suspen.shtml#valve Some JL8 cars have the valve, btw.
__________________
Kurt S - CRG |
| The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to Kurt S For This Useful Post: | ||
dykstra (12-05-2025), Nova Research Project (12-05-2025), rlw68 (12-06-2025), Steve Shauger (Yesterday) | ||
|
#15
|
|||
|
|||
|
Thank you guys, I see not definitive pattern for this - and unfortunately no real pattern either.
Recognize this was not my thread but Georges, i appreciate hearing the input and thoughts etc. I was under the impression this was a pretty clear answer, especially for the 69Z cars, all had 12 bolts, boosters and masters with distribution valves and dump valves. Obviously not. Thanks again..... I got it - there is conflicting info on what is right or wrong or no real definitive pattern for the application.
__________________
Eddie M Camaro-less 87 El Camino SS Few Ferrari's |
|
#16
|
|||
|
|||
|
My 69 Z built late June does have the valve mounted on the subframe. Hope this helps!! Greg, my 70 L34 Nova does not have the valve on the subframe and is a January built car. I take it that the early Novas go up to November or December??
Last edited by Mr.Nickey Nova; Yesterday at 03:50 PM. |
| The Following User Says Thank You to Mr.Nickey Nova For This Useful Post: | ||
enio45 (Yesterday) | ||
|
#17
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
Precisely, Willow Run made several production changes at the end of 1969. Not having it on the subframe in January makes sense. What build week in January? I can compare with the database. Greg
__________________
Nova Research Project at chevynova.org |
|
#18
|
|||
|
|||
|
A topic that I have wondered about for a long time.
I was working with the understanding that all 69 Z28 & BB cars had them. 12 bolt applications makes sense- as does not required on JL8 cars. However, my NOR 02B X77 does not have one- and have always wondered why. Was thinking perhaps someone had replaced the subframe at some point in its early life. Though it did appear to be quite unmolested & original when I completely disassembled & rebuilt the car in 2020. Last edited by 3X24SPD; Yesterday at 11:08 PM. |
|
#19
|
|||
|
|||
|
Not to change the subject, but I realize that some cars came with the pressure release valve and some cars did not. My car is a 03D build and it has the valve. Did all the sub-frames coming down the assembly line have the hole for the provision for the valve.
__________________
1966 Corvette Coupe L79 Mossport Green 1969 Camaro Z/28 Hugger Orange NCRS #22211 |
|
#20
|
||||
|
||||
|
^^
1968 LOS Z28 Subframe has provision No Valve: I would hazard a guess that ALL sub frames were spec to have provisions i.e. holes for locating tang and self tapping screw for install of valve as needed.
__________________
69 Los Z11 68 SS/RS 396/325 68 Los Z28
|
![]() |
|
|