'69 Chevelle #s 375hp/4-sp, Great Docs

[Motorhead848]

Originally Posted by Hotrodpaul

Is it just me or do the broachmarks look manufactured?

They sure seem heavy. Deep enough to hold paint….curious what others think. Neat car if it all checks out

[scuncio]

Thought the picture wasn’t good enough to make a call on the broach marks, but I also found them a little unconventional looking.

Has anyone else seen “gauges” misspelled on a build sheet?

[GotGrunt]

Originally Posted by scuncio

Thought the picture wasn’t good enough to make a call on the broach marks, but I also found them a little unconventional looking.

Has anyone else seen “gauges” misspelled on a build sheet?

1969 Framingham build sheets are scarce and if found, most of the time it will only be the left 1/3 of the sheet. U14 will not be on that side, so not many to compare to. The misspelling is definitely suspect as are the broach marks but I can’t say for sure without further investigation.

[LT1vette]

Originally Posted by GotGrunt

1969 Framingham build sheets are scarce and if found, most of the time it will only be the left 1/3 of the sheet. U14 will not be on that side, so not many to compare to. The misspelling is definitely suspect as are the broach marks but I can’t say for sure without further investigation.

Where are we looking for the misspelling? I looked at all the info and couldn't see it...

Maybe you were thinking gages?

[GotGrunt]

Originally Posted by LT1vette

Where are we looking for the misspelling? I looked at all the info and couldn't see it...

Maybe you were thinking gages?

It’s spelled gauge, not guage.

[LT1vette]

Originally Posted by GotGrunt

It’s spelled gauge, not guage.

Some days you can't see the forest for the trees!!! LOL

I looked at that 2-3 times and said to myself, Why do these guys think it should be spelled gage???

Nothing wrong with me eyes, just the computation...

THX