Go Back   The Supercar Registry > General Discussion > Technical & Restoration


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 05-19-2021, 03:09 PM
Zman1969 Zman1969 is offline
Yenko Contributing Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: DFW Tx
Posts: 742
Thanks: 282
Thanked 168 Times in 66 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by L78_Nova View Post
The GM off road cams are nice if you have lots of rear gear.
They are lumpy old school, No bottom end torque, goodness

And VERY easy on valve springs !!

I run a 140 with 1.7 rockers in my 72 nova 350 flat tops zero decked with 4.33 rear and fast burn heads.
11.60's @ 113.
Definitely needs good fuel. I add a couple gallons of 100 LL to a tank of 91.
Gary
thanks L78 nova simple answer of being low on torque


Quote:
Originally Posted by NorCam View Post
Your posts are confusing?

You ask for advice on an LT-1 cam, then jump in saying hold up...nothing lumpy? Then you post again the next day asking about two camshafts known as the lumpiest of the DZ-302 profiles?

Read that whatever way you want...
Jump in? I didn't ask about Lumpy sounding cam for the LT1. You jumped in with if someone wants a lumpy cam... so your post wasn't related to my initial post was it?

I appreciate all the other suggestions here guys Lynn I'm leaning towards the LT1 cam but was initially concerned about LT1 detonation as the 302's kind of missed that with the stock cam, right now my 302 with 3.31s and stock exhaust manifolds is a bit of a pig to get moving
__________________
69 RS/Z 302 VE3 Daytona
69 Chevelle SS 396 375
69 T/A clone LS6/6 speed
90 Formula 350
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 05-19-2021, 04:26 PM
NorCam's Avatar
NorCam NorCam is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: Alberta, Canada
Posts: 4,239
Thanks: 2,784
Thanked 3,604 Times in 1,285 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Zman1969 View Post

so your post wasn't related to my initial post was it?
Yes...it was actually. Many of the cams that you were provided including the so-called "several" I suggested were very suitable choices for an LT1 build. The roller cam I suggested with its 236/240 duration is an excellent hydraulic roller camshaft for an LT1 and makes enough vacuum to handle power brakes as well as support the RS headlamp operations. You did also say in your original post that you had no issues with a roller cam...did you not?

Quote:
I have no issues going back flat tappet or even a street roller

Well? That was a really good street roller. If it's a little too lumpy for you, then understand that the entire line of hydraulic rollers is easily bumped down a step or two to what becomes a very mild-mannered street cam, and is totally forgiving on the valve train. Something the guys at Crower could have easily helped you out with. Seriously...they work with everyday people to help select camshafts all the time.

All snide aside...good luck with your engine build.
__________________
I like solid lifter cars, big cams and cars w/ 3 pedals in them.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 12:56 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.

O Garage vBulletin Plugins by Drive Thru Online, Inc.