Dedicated to the Promotion and Preservation of American Muscle Cars, Dealer built Supercars and COPO cars. |
|
|||||||
| Register | Album Gallery | Thread Gallery | FAQ | Community | Calendar | Become a Paid Member | Today's Posts | Search |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
03-08-2016, 05:39 AM
|
||||
|
||||
Re: Is "stance" important?
Since we are on the subject of "stance"...wow I can't believe this thread is this long but anyway---Out of curiosity what do you guys think about the stance on my Camaro. Good or bad?
__________________
I currently own a 1969 Camaro SS350. Although the original drivetrain is long gone, this 4/speed car has a March '69 HC coded block with #041 heads. The transmission is an M20 Muncie #660 case and the rearend is a BS coded 12 bolt posi. Built in Van Nuys. 
|
| The Following User Says Thank You to 69VN For This Useful Post: | ||
Outlaw68Nova (11-04-2018) | ||
|
#2
05-14-2016, 07:07 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Is "stance" important?
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: 69VN</div><div class="ubbcode-body">Since we are on the subject of "stance"...wow I can't believe this thread is this long but anyway---Out of curiosity what do you guys think about the stance on my Camaro. Good or bad?
</div></div> nailed it for stock appearance
__________________
Follow me on Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/mbcgarage/
|
|
#3
05-15-2016, 02:29 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Is "stance" important?
My 68Z in the late 70s
__________________
69 RS SS L78 conv 69 RS SS ZL1 69 L78 Chevelle conv 69 L78 Nova 69 L34 Nova 67 SS Chevelle 73 Trans Am
|
|
|
|
Hybrid Mode
