Dedicated to the Promotion and Preservation of American Muscle Cars, Dealer built Supercars and COPO cars. |
|
|||||||
| Register | Album Gallery | Thread Gallery | FAQ | Community | Calendar | Become a Paid Member | Today's Posts | Search |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#11
|
||||
|
||||
|
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: ssl78</div><div class="ubbcode-body"> Does any body know the thickness of a 69 Chevy big block deck pad that hasnt been decked. The first shot is a block thats been decked the second is a non decked block but it is a 74 dated block.
Wouldnt this be a sure way of being able to identify a restamp ![]() ![]() </div></div> My educated opinion is that would not give a conclusive answer. There are core shifts in castings and that is why some have thin cylinder walls on 1 side after a re-bore and also why the thrust surface where the cam is installed is off center often. Because of these shifts that pad probably falls into a range that could vary .100 (swag) whereas a deck may be as little as a clean up cut or a blueprint (zero deck height to piston tops). There are so many variables that nothing conclusive could be measured from that pad thickness,IMO.
__________________
69 SS/RS 396 M20 X22 Nor 12B,72B,712 bought 1979 FULL OWNER HISTORY 69 Dick Harrell tribute Day II 427 M20 4.10 X11 76 orig pnt, 711 67 Super Stock 302 Camaro re-creation |
|
|