Go Back   The Supercar Registry > Dealer Specific Discussion > COPO - United States


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 12-07-2012, 04:44 PM
camaromb camaromb is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Bensenville, Il USA
Posts: 983
Thanks: 3
Thanked 9 Times in 8 Posts
Default Re: ZL1 # 48 coming to Barrett-Jackson

It is another long lost missing ZL1. It has never shown up on US title searches done decades ago by the guys who were seriously searching for these cars. It was in a body shop near Toronto a few years ago. I was told it had no trim tag and the body sheet metal dates were in the 24th week of '69 or so. I think this one needs some serious inspection.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 12-09-2012, 09:09 PM
quik9r's Avatar
quik9r quik9r is offline
Yenko Contributing Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Burlington,Ontario, Canada
Posts: 162
Thanks: 4
Thanked 22 Times in 8 Posts
Default Re: ZL1 # 48 coming to Barrett-Jackson

Third party chatter,speculation, and hearsay from “some guy in a body shop” may not be a fair way to judge the car in question. Some of the information posted has originated from a source who has other issues with the owner, and is factually wrong. It is not always those who think they are" in the know "that have access to rare and elite cars. We all have a common interest in bringing real, rare cars into the spotlight. What is puzzling is how some cars with real issues dare not be criticized, yet new finds are dismissed so casually.

Quik9r
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 12-10-2012, 03:34 AM
camaromb camaromb is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Bensenville, Il USA
Posts: 983
Thanks: 3
Thanked 9 Times in 8 Posts
Default Re: ZL1 # 48 coming to Barrett-Jackson

This is the same "third parter chatter" and "hearsay" that led to the 5 ZL1 Camaros that were registered by one owner one the same day, the questionable yellow L89 Camaro, numerous rebody issue Copo cars, etc. all occurring in Canada. This car is not casually dismissed but seriously questioned because of its inspection by "some guy in a body shop". I bet it was in more than one body shop so how is the source who has issues with the car owner the only one who may have seen the car? At issue is the car itself. We hope is a real rare car, that just has not always been the case with some of the rare Canadian cars appearing in recent years with no real histories at all.

It all comes down to due diligence; if the body has March/earlier '69 not June '69 dates, the trim tag is real, etc. then this will be just idle chatter. Any prospective buyer will want to verify the true condition of the # 48 ZL1 Camaro in question with a qualified inspection. That is the only way to end all the idle chatter and set the facts straight.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 12:50 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.

O Garage vBulletin Plugins by Drive Thru Online, Inc.