Caveat Emptor...tag swap?

[William]

https://www.ebay.com/itm/156181133429

124379N608881

Reported VIN is for a Camaro built at the Norwood, OH plant on or about March 5, 1969

Car has an 04L body tag from a car built April 30 or May 1, 1969.

One or both tags may not be original to the car; hidden VINs may not match.

[wayoutz]

Originally Posted by William

https://www.ebay.com/itm/156181133429

124379N608881

Reported VIN is for a Camaro built at the Norwood, OH plant on or about March 5, 1969

Car has an 04L body tag from a car built April 30 or May 1, 1969.

One or both tags may not be original to the car; hidden VINs may not match.

04L tags were noted as some originals correct?

[William]

Yes, in the approximate VIN range N636598 - N638301. The range includes a few 04C and many 05A tags.

Sorting through it, nothing about 04L cars jumps off the page. Most colors are there, all X codes are there. One slight oddity, no 04L six-cylinder cars.

What does it mean? Good question. Maybe something, maybe not. The body tag was Fisher info only, Chevy final assembly did not need to reference it. Probably set up the tag stamper incorrectly for a shift.

[wayoutz]

Originally Posted by William

Yes, in the approximate VIN range N636598 - N638301. The range includes a few 04C and many 05A tags.

Sorting through it, nothing about 04L cars jumps off the page. Most colors are there, all X codes are there. One slight oddity, no 04L six-cylinder cars.

What does it mean? Good question. Maybe something, maybe not. The body tag was Fisher info only, Chevy final assembly did not need to reference it. Probably set up the tag stamper incorrectly for a shift.

Yea have a buddy of mine just bought a 69 Z28 just certified by JM with an 04L trim tag certified to be the original tag to car.