|
Register | Album Gallery | Thread Gallery | FAQ | Community | Calendar | Become a Paid Member | Today's Posts | Search |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
||||
|
||||
Deepgroove Alternator Pulley
An original used #3829387 AI single Deepgroove Alt. pulley.
Clean,but was dropped at one time so there is a slight inward crease on the outside edge that's under an inch long. The belt stays true,so it's mostly appearance. It weighs 2lbs.,is 3-5/8" diameter and fits a 43/64 shaft. It's 1/2" wide and still has it's original finish. <u>Was original equipment on the following cars:</u> 1967 Camaro w/302cid.(Z/28) 1969 Corvette w/HD 427cid. 1966-68 Corvette 427cid.w/o PS. 1965-66 Corvette w/solid lifter 396cid. 1965-67 Corvette w/Spcl.Hi-perf 327 & w/o AC or PS. 1966 Chevelle w/396/375Hp.(L-78) 1965-66 Impala w/solid lifter 396cid. 1963 Impala w/409cid. w/o AC. $100 shipped [email protected] Money back gaurantee if not as stated or satisfied. Check out my other classified ads here,as I am slooooowly selling over 30 years of some scarce & desireable parts & memorabilia. |
#2
|
||||
|
||||
Re: Deepgroove Alternator Pulley
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
Re: Deepgroove Alternator Pulley
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
Re: Deepgroove Alternator Pulley
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
Re: Deepgroove Alternator Pulley
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
Re: Deepgroove Alternator Pulley
|
#7
|
||||
|
||||
Re: Deepgroove Alternator Pulley
|
#8
|
||||
|
||||
Re: Deepgroove Alternator Pulley
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Deepgroove Alternator Pulley
Rick,
Does this pulley have the # stamped in the pulley and "AI"? I can't see it in the photos. We are building a '67 Z28 engine now for a customer and I need some parts including this pulley. Let me know. Thanks, Jerry |
#10
|
||||
|
||||
Re: Deepgroove Alternator Pulley
No part number was ever stamped on this pulley at all.
I have seen both type of pulleys as original equipment from the assembly line. More then one manufacturer perhaps? This one came off a Vette. I was tempted to hammer it down,but thought that I would do a terrible job peening it back w/o the proper tools and it would look erratic. I purposely took pictures in direct sunlight to show more details.It looked more defined then the overhead room light,I hope others agree. |