Go Back   The Supercar Registry > General Discussion > Supercar/Musclecar Discussion


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11  
Old 11-22-2018, 05:46 PM
ZiggyL78's Avatar
ZiggyL78 ZiggyL78 is offline
Yenko Contributing Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Toronto Canada
Posts: 764
Thanks: 118
Thanked 279 Times in 87 Posts
Default

All explained.It still sucks.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ilZ_fb75j_8&t=187s
__________________
Real Canadian Rock
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Zdeo-i6uw5g
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 11-22-2018, 08:32 PM
GMC_Typhoon GMC_Typhoon is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Nashville
Posts: 411
Thanks: 2
Thanked 167 Times in 67 Posts
Default

I for one welcome our robot overlords.
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 11-22-2018, 10:59 PM
x33rs x33rs is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2017
Location: AZ
Posts: 759
Thanks: 43
Thanked 417 Times in 238 Posts
Default

I don't care for it.

We haven't liked the direction the big 3 had been heading for years. Which is why we went back 50 years, sold all our new stuff, and just drive our classics daily. Don't care for the fuel injection anymore, tired of computers, too many gadgets, too many safety features, back up camera this, lane correction that, it's just too much. And none of it seems to be helping drivers because they are still just as bad as ever, lol.

I don't see myself even watching 2 electric cars drag racing. I'm not paying to get in the gate for that. Noise, the crisp pop of high compression and the smell of high test fuel are all part of the attraction for us.

Okay off the soap box,
Happy Thanksgiving
Reply With Quote
The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to x33rs For This Useful Post:
Arrowsmith (11-23-2018), Carleen (11-27-2018), m22mike (11-23-2018), PeteLeathersac (11-23-2018)
  #14  
Old 11-23-2018, 03:13 AM
Lee Stewart's Avatar
Lee Stewart Lee Stewart is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2017
Location: ABQ, New Mexico
Posts: 36,633
Thanks: 3,506
Thanked 136,490 Times in 22,778 Posts
Default

LOL . . . what a bunch of Luddites!

Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Lee Stewart For This Useful Post:
L78M22Rag (11-23-2018)
  #15  
Old 11-23-2018, 12:40 PM
x33rs x33rs is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2017
Location: AZ
Posts: 759
Thanks: 43
Thanked 417 Times in 238 Posts
Default

I'm the short one in the back
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 11-23-2018, 03:22 PM
70 copo 70 copo is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: chillicothe Ohio 45601
Posts: 3,834
Thanks: 219
Thanked 1,231 Times in 576 Posts
Default

All fine and dandy, I like the cartoon but lets look deeper shall we? I think that until we gain the technology to charge cars wireless - the current grid will not even begin to manage the draw required.

The math here is pretty simple: a home charging system for a Tesla currently requires 75 amp service - just for the car. The average small house is equipped with 100 amp service in total.

Funny but true - as part of UN Agenda 21 implementation the group tasked with nudging us plebes into technology acceptance actually takes on the acronym "eMOB".

Historically electric cars were already developed about 120 years ago, and were abandoned because of the limitation of energy that could be stored.

So I think electric cars are still dead on re-arrival with the exception of perhaps a city commuter (as a short trip car) where the existing hi voltage infrastructure is already in place for charging stations. The Chevy Bolt fits in here perfectly with a 32 amp charging station the car takes about 8 hours to charge.

The bottom line I think will be that unless these cars have at least a similar recharging time to that of a gasoline car there will be little near term adaptation by people unless compliance is forced.

Welcome to the future!
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 11-23-2018, 03:54 PM
McCune McCune is offline
Yenko Contributing Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2017
Location: St.George,Utah
Posts: 479
Thanks: 427
Thanked 271 Times in 111 Posts
Default

Graphene.
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 11-23-2018, 04:01 PM
Keith Seymore's Avatar
Keith Seymore Keith Seymore is offline
Yenko Contributing Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Motor City
Posts: 2,500
Thanks: 2,620
Thanked 4,492 Times in 1,247 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by GMC_Typhoon View Post
I for one welcome our robot overlords.
Me too.

I was the Assistant Program Engineer for the Gen I Volt and its derivatives. I managed the 2012 program, plus export/overseas and RH drive (including Opel, Vauxhall and Holden).

As a result I drove a Volt or Opel captured test fleet vehicle for about a four year period. The assembly plant is about 30 miles from my house, which means I could drive all the way there on one charge, top off at the plant and drive all the way home on one charge. The only time I kicked the internal combustion engine on was if I deviated from my normal route, or if we took an extended trip (like going up north).

To me, the beauty of an electric vehicle (besides not getting my clothes all smelly - and the instantaneous torque) is that you have the opportunity to move towards alternative fuel. Wind, hydro, solar, nuclear are all available for the taking. With petrol you are pretty much stuck with petrol (maybe corn).

If you haven't driven one you owe it to yourself to do so. Unexpected benefits were that they were zippy, with a low center of gravity and instant torque, and did surprisingly well in the snow (even though we worked with Goodyear to design tires that were especially low rolling resistance). They even had a "sport" mode, which became my default setting.

Did I mention instantaneous torque?

K
Attached Images
    
__________________
'63 LeMans Convertible
'63 Grand Prix
'65 GTO - original, unrestored, Dad was original owner, 5000 mile Royal Pontiac factory racer
'74 Chevelle - original owner, 9.85 @ 136 mph best

Last edited by Keith Seymore; 11-23-2018 at 05:26 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 11-23-2018, 04:07 PM
70 copo 70 copo is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: chillicothe Ohio 45601
Posts: 3,834
Thanks: 219
Thanked 1,231 Times in 576 Posts
Default

It appears that GM believes that they have stumbled on to the electric equivalent of the Model T, and that would explain the sudden shift to electric vehicles from a technology investment standpoint.

Word is that GM will launch two new cars soon based on Bolt technology.
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 11-23-2018, 05:01 PM
JKZ27 JKZ27 is offline
Yenko Contributing Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2017
Location: Maryland
Posts: 196
Thanks: 46
Thanked 31 Times in 25 Posts
Default

I get it. Its coming, regardless. 700hp can be fun no matter what's producing it. The environment, resources, "safety", progress.... I get it. And, I guess I'm ok with it.

But, I have a love affair with machines and harnessed fire, the simplistic beauty of oil bathed metal on metal with no logic other than mechanically operated human input resulting in perfect or imperfect, but direct, outputs. I grew up living and loving this stuff and I can't just "un-love" it now because its being replaced. I make my living working on new cars so I'm quite aware of new technology and its relevance and importance. As of right now, though, if I buy an electric car it will be out of necessity, not because I find them fun to drive.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 10:26 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.

O Garage vBulletin Plugins by Drive Thru Online, Inc.