Go Back   The Supercar Registry > Events > Auctions


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11  
Old 04-14-2022, 05:01 PM
PeteLeathersac's Avatar
PeteLeathersac PeteLeathersac is offline
Yenko Contributing Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: O' Canada
Posts: 12,041
Thanks: 14,821
Thanked 4,230 Times in 1,977 Posts
Default

'

As current '69 'Velle thread, some factory GM info noted Copo 9511 necessary to get 4:56 or 4:88 for 1969 cars only....all models.
Even though 9511 not noted w/ this L88's paperwork, the M22 may be specific to suit rear also the 9511 may've shown if 4:56 part was printed info, not added w/ pen?

~ Pete

.
__________________
I like real cars best...especially the REAL real ones!
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 04-14-2022, 07:43 PM
Drew Papsun Drew Papsun is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Norwalk, CT
Posts: 119
Thanks: 2
Thanked 15 Times in 10 Posts
Default Update info

Quote:
Originally Posted by TimG View Post
Does anyone know the VIN of this car?
Hello Tim,
The VIN is 194679S722688 to answer your question.
Best Regards,
Drew Papsun
203-286-6024
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Drew Papsun For This Useful Post:
PeteLeathersac (04-14-2022)
  #13  
Old 04-14-2022, 09:54 PM
useless tony useless tony is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2022
Posts: 56
Thanks: 0
Thanked 37 Times in 23 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Keith Seymore View Post
Central Office Production Order. It doesn't have to be "large". Not sure how you made that jump.
I jumped to the assumption that COPO meant large volume because it is my understanding that a GM dealer wasn't able to put in an order for a 427 Camaro or Chevelle due to the ban on anything larger than 400 in a Camaro or Chevelle. The way around the issue, allegedly, was to order enough vehicles in order to qualify the order as a "fleet" purchase and apparently "fleet" purchases could be ordered with any engine available. The "order enough" vehicles is why I assumed a volume buy was required. That is also why I understand that a few dealers got together and ordered as a group, so they could order the required number.

Believe me, I am not claiming I know what I am talking about

The COPO fleet order makes those cars special (in my mind) simply because not every dealer could or would want to place a large order. That being said, the apparent fact (or possibility) that a certain trans or rear gear may have required a COPO order isn't special in my eyes if any dealer could have placed that order.

Ticking a box on a different order form (the COPO form) in order to get 4.88 gears, something that (it sounds like) any dealer could have done just isn't the same (again, to me) as a dealer or a couple of dealers getting together to pull the wool over GM's eyes, go against company policy, and order something GM said it won't allow.

COPO ordered 4.88's isn't special if that was simply the process needed in order to get that ratio. The gear ratio itself may be worth talking about if it is one of three (or whatever) to get the ratio but that it had to be ordered through COPO ... meh ... not seeing it as special

Please keep in mind, this is just my opinion and I have already admitted to not knowing what I am talking about

Last edited by useless tony; 04-14-2022 at 09:58 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 04-14-2022, 11:22 PM
TimG TimG is offline
Yenko Contributing Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 4,129
Thanks: 1
Thanked 1,843 Times in 749 Posts
Default

Drew, thank you so much. I want to put the VIN with the tank sticker in my files.
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 04-15-2022, 04:34 PM
Tracker1's Avatar
Tracker1 Tracker1 is offline
Yenko Contributing Member
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: ONTARIO
Posts: 3,318
Thanks: 858
Thanked 886 Times in 437 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by PeteLeathersac View Post
'

As current '69 'Velle thread, some factory GM info noted Copo 9511 necessary to get 4:56 or 4:88 for 1969 cars only....all models.
Even though 9511 not noted w/ this L88's paperwork, the M22 may be specific to suit rear also the 9511 may've shown if 4:56 part was printed info, not added w/ pen?

~ Pete

.
That is where my head was on it Pete, speedo gear adjustment
__________________
I ain't nobody, dork.

Last edited by Tracker1; 04-15-2022 at 04:37 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 04-20-2022, 05:42 AM
Kurt S Kurt S is offline
Yenko Contributing Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Ann Arbor, MI
Posts: 2,968
Thanks: 2
Thanked 603 Times in 298 Posts
Default

9S721263 has almost the same options - L88, M22, 4.56 - and it doesn't list the COPO trans.
ZW1 is that it's an internal RPO and would not have shown up on the window sticker or shipper. That said, I don't know why it's listed at all.

Quote:
Originally Posted by TimG View Post
Does anyone know the VIN of this car?
The VIN is actually 194679S721688, not 9S722688.
__________________
Kurt S - CRG

Last edited by Kurt S; 04-20-2022 at 05:51 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 04-20-2022, 12:20 PM
TimG TimG is offline
Yenko Contributing Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 4,129
Thanks: 1
Thanked 1,843 Times in 749 Posts
Default

Thank's Kurt. I googled the VIN and it is 21688.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 04:02 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.

O Garage vBulletin Plugins by Drive Thru Online, Inc.