Go Back   The Supercar Registry > General Discussion > Chevrolet


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 01-22-2024, 11:38 PM
Richls5's Avatar
Richls5 Richls5 is offline
Yenko Contributing Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2020
Posts: 217
Thanks: 14
Thanked 119 Times in 62 Posts
Default rebuilding LS6 for chevelle

Original LS6 carin my car is tired pulled it to bring in for rebuild. my engine builder is trying to steer me toward a hydraulic roller . Someone along the way put a flat tappet hydraulic lifter cam. I drive the car maybe 2-300 miles a year Id like to go to a solid roller to be more correct but hes really trying to steer me toward hydaulic just getting others thoughts
Reply With Quote
Click here to view all the pictures posted in this thread...
  #2  
Old 01-23-2024, 01:25 AM
Too Many Projects's Avatar
Too Many Projects Too Many Projects is offline
Yenko Contributing Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2020
Location: Town of Troy, WI
Posts: 4,174
Thanks: 2,173
Thanked 3,039 Times in 1,406 Posts
Default

If you don't plan to twist the engine to it's limits, I would go with the hydraulic roller in a heartbeat. Less maintenance for you and just as reliable. The hydraulics would still work fine at 6,500 anyway...
__________________
Mitch
1970 Chevelle SS
1966 Chevelle SS
1967 Camaro ss/rs
1938 Business coupe, street rod
2000 FXSTS, original owner, 13k miles
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 01-23-2024, 05:42 AM
Tuna Joe Tuna Joe is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2023
Location: Ojai
Posts: 97
Thanks: 88
Thanked 213 Times in 48 Posts
Default

I’m in the process of rebuilding my 1969 L89 and I’m going to go with a hydraulic roller.
I’m going to follow One Stop Restoration’s advice and go with Erson Cams.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 01-23-2024, 11:55 AM
big gear head's Avatar
big gear head big gear head is offline
Yenko Contributing Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: KY
Posts: 3,111
Thanks: 4,796
Thanked 1,120 Times in 639 Posts
Default

I just love a good flat tappet solid. Be careful with a solid roller on the street. Some of them don't do well. I had one in my car for a few years and I got tired of replacing distributor gears and the rollers in the lifters were going bad.

Just remember, it's YOUR decision. Don't let someone talk you into something that you don't really want.
__________________
Freddie
1969 Camaro RS/SS396 (427) 4 speed
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to big gear head For This Useful Post:
Arrowsmith (01-24-2024)
  #5  
Old 01-23-2024, 01:04 PM
napa68's Avatar
napa68 napa68 is offline
SCR Sponsor
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Presque Isle, WI
Posts: 3,271
Thanks: 4,454
Thanked 3,201 Times in 923 Posts
Default

A flat tappet solid should be no problem. The engine builder needs to check for proper rotation of the lifter in the bore to begin with. EDM lifters have improved the landscape of the flat tappet discussion significantly.

My parting thought on the conversation is this......
These are getting to be very expensive cars. I myself, want the car to be authentic. That includes the sound of solids.
Reply With Quote
The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to napa68 For This Useful Post:
1971ls6 (01-23-2024), Arrowsmith (01-24-2024), RPOLS3 (01-24-2024), tunes (01-23-2024)
  #6  
Old 01-24-2024, 11:46 AM
Richls5's Avatar
Richls5 Richls5 is offline
Yenko Contributing Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2020
Posts: 217
Thanks: 14
Thanked 119 Times in 62 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by big gear head View Post
I just love a good flat tappet solid. Be careful with a solid roller on the street. Some of them don't do well. I had one in my car for a few years and I got tired of replacing distributor gears and the rollers in the lifters were going bad.

Just remember, it's YOUR decision. Don't let someone talk you into something that you don't really want.
yeah im aware ive just been using this family to build motors for over 20 years and hes never steered me wrong. this is the first stock motor hes done everything has always been improved over stock
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 01-24-2024, 03:05 PM
Crossbreed383 Crossbreed383 is offline
Yenko Contributing Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: KY
Posts: 168
Thanks: 0
Thanked 307 Times in 75 Posts
Default

I responded to a thread here not long ago explaining the issues with most cam failures these days but no one seemed responsive ??
Oh and I work at BTR and do all the custom cam work as well as run the Spintron and engine dyno from time to time when help is needed .
We are grinding cams inhouse but aren't doing anything BB although I spec and have them ground for customers all the time
Nick E.
__________________
Custom Cam /Engine Dyno and Spintron Operator at Brian Tooley Racing R@D
84 Mustang/Hertz Rent-a-Car
438CI 5.58@123 8.80@147 On Radials ALL MOTOR
Powered by my 13 year olds engine program
68 NOVA 396-375 HP F.A.S.T. Project
Reply With Quote
The Following 7 Users Say Thank You to Crossbreed383 For This Useful Post:
427 (01-24-2024), big gear head (01-24-2024), dustinm (01-24-2024), Igosplut (01-26-2024), PeteLeathersac (01-24-2024), Pro Stock John (01-24-2024), Xplantdad (01-24-2024)
  #8  
Old 01-24-2024, 05:01 PM
RobR RobR is online now
Yenko Contributing Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Central New Jersey
Posts: 612
Thanks: 423
Thanked 275 Times in 105 Posts
Default

Nick, i’m glad you posted here. I was looking for your other post you mentioned to ad to this thread. it’s one of the main reason these problems exist in flat tap at cams. Deviating from the cam core shape when changing centerlines and lobe shapes making hardness treatment very thin in some areas.

If you can find that post it’s worth reposting here. It’s very insightful and worth reading. thanks, Rob.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 01-24-2024, 07:42 PM
RobR RobR is online now
Yenko Contributing Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Central New Jersey
Posts: 612
Thanks: 423
Thanked 275 Times in 105 Posts
Default

Nick’s post:
The issue IMO is more to do with insufficient case hardened depth on the cam cores being used. The issue is when the case depth on the nose isn't enough and this is magnified because of spring psi being highest at over the nose of the cam, than on the base circle of the cam .
Certain companies use the same UGL( unground lobe ) cam cores for a multitude of cam valve events, pt numbers , etc . The issue lies in that you harden the lobes during heat treat, but when you try to cut the more than one cam profile, using multiple centerlines or lobe lift( base circle) on the same core ,you end up grinding away too much or even going through the heat treat in some spots.
If the use a specialty UGL for each specific cam then the case depth is set at XX mm of what it needs and you after final grinding you are left with sufficient heat treat depth.
We see it all the time here .
Thanks
Reply With Quote
The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to RobR For This Useful Post:
427 (01-26-2024), Arrowsmith (01-24-2024), Igosplut (01-26-2024), scuncio (01-26-2024)
  #10  
Old 01-23-2024, 01:48 PM
SS427's Avatar
SS427 SS427 is offline
Yenko Contributing Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Pleasant Plains, IL
Posts: 10,150
Thanks: 2,681
Thanked 3,880 Times in 1,004 Posts
Default

Flat tappet cams have been an issue for many years now but I would try and find one of the few people that are grinding their own cams. There are names out there that can be trusted who are making good cams right now but don't use any of the major cam manufactures as I have had no luck with any of them. The solid lifter sound is what makes the LS6 Chevelle stand out. Quieting that cam ruins it for me. Like taking the whine out of an M22 or the sound of an Rolls Royce Merlin. Silence it and its just another engine.
__________________
Rick Nelson
Musclecar Restoration and Design, Inc
www.musclecarrestorationanddesign.com
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=62r-6vgk2_8
specializing in (only real) LS6 Chevelle restorations
Reply With Quote
The Following 15 Users Say Thank You to SS427 For This Useful Post:
Arrowsmith (01-24-2024), Big Block Bill (01-23-2024), DAVE H (01-26-2024), downunder1 (01-23-2024), dustinm (01-23-2024), dykstra (04-18-2024), Igosplut (01-24-2024), JBALL (01-24-2024), ls6owner (01-24-2024), McCune (01-24-2024), PeteLeathersac (01-24-2024), Richls5 (01-23-2024), RPOLS3 (01-24-2024), tunes (01-23-2024), Xplantdad (01-23-2024)
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 02:15 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.

O Garage vBulletin Plugins by Drive Thru Online, Inc.