Dedicated to the Promotion and Preservation of American Muscle Cars, Dealer built Supercars and COPO cars. |
|
|||||||
| Register | Album Gallery | Thread Gallery | FAQ | Community | Calendar | Become a Paid Member | Today's Posts | Search |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#61
09-08-2007, 06:41 AM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Would a 435HP vette be considered a SUPERCAR?
I got your "truck motor" Kwizzer...
__________________
 <span style="font-weight: bold"> (__{B}_____]]]]~~~~</span>Don't mess with old farts - age and treachery will always overcome youth and skill! Bullshit and brilliance only come with age and experience. 
|
|
#62
09-08-2007, 01:14 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Would a 435HP vette be considered a SUPERCAR?
[ QUOTE ]
Then how about a 1967 COPO Pace Car. The special paint must have reduced the wind resistance/drag, thus enhancing performance. [/ QUOTE ] Too bad GM didn't understand how lucrative the "replica" market was back in 1967 maybe they would have built more? I guess the concept of offering something novel and unique caught on in later years 
__________________
Pat Railsback 67 0-1 Camaro L35/M40/3.07 68 RS/SS Camaro L78/M22/4.56 69 Z11 Camaro L34/M20/3.73
|
|
#63
09-08-2007, 04:08 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Would a 435HP vette be considered a SUPERCAR?
[ QUOTE ]
I got your "truck motor" Kwizzer... [/ QUOTE ] What he said! 
|
|
#65
09-08-2007, 11:36 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Would a 435HP vette be considered a SUPERCAR?
[ QUOTE ]
SUPERCAR has an interesting definition, the ZL1 Camaro of which 69 were ordered through COPO which was not easily available to public is a SUPERCAR BUT the ZL1 Corvette which were easily available, ordered through RPO available to general public of which only 2 were made is not a SUPERCAR. I understand completely, I think. [/ QUOTE ] ZL1 corvette = Supercar in my book!  Patrick
|
|
#66
09-09-2007, 06:47 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Would a 435HP vette be considered a SUPERCAR?
__________________
Baseball, Hot Dogs, Apple Pie and Chevrolet
|
|
#67
09-09-2007, 08:02 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Would a 435HP vette be considered a SUPERCAR?
Probably just retired from service last month. When you say Sissy sells shakes, does it sound like you're whistling??
 
|
|
#68
09-09-2007, 08:05 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Would a 435HP vette be considered a SUPERCAR?
OK! A fire truck with a 409?
__________________
|
|
#69
09-09-2007, 08:10 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Would a 435HP vette be considered a SUPERCAR?
Verne......
I'm on your side......would love a 409......even in a fire truck!!!!!!!!
__________________
Baseball, Hot Dogs, Apple Pie and Chevrolet
|
|
#70
09-09-2007, 07:02 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Would a 435HP vette be considered a SUPERCAR?
Pretty cool fire truck...
__________________
<span style="font-weight: bold"> (__{B}_____]]]]~~~~</span>Don't mess with old farts - age and treachery will always overcome youth and skill! Bullshit and brilliance only come with age and experience.
|
|
|
|
Linear Mode
