![]() Dedicated to the Promotion and Preservation of American Muscle Cars, Dealer built Supercars and COPO cars. |
|
Register | Album Gallery | Thread Gallery | FAQ | Community | Calendar | Become a Paid Member | Today's Posts | Search |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Lynn</div><div class="ubbcode-body">Did this car have a tach? If so, did it also have console gauges? </div></div>
Weren't the first 50 Gibb cars pretty bare bones?? (less car #3)... no console cars. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
All 50 Gibb ZL1s had standard warning lights, a speedometer and a fuel gauge. No gauges, clock, radio.
__________________
Learning more and more about less and less... |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Just read everything on this car and as a new member and neutral person I think camaromb answered his own question. Since 2 cars have the same VIN on the firewall he gave 8 reasons why the picture he posted is fake. quik9r, supercomp 8.90 and greenLS6 show why the other is more than likely real with the original seam sealer. camaromb also states " It has never shown up on US title searches done decades ago by the guys who were seriously searching for these cars." Well it makes sense that with the 1 mistakenly typed in the title where the 9 should be anyone searching for the VIN with a 9 would never ever find it. Yes thousands if not tens of thousands of titles were typed in wrong upon ownership changes by state employees who didn't care (its just a job)or double check everything they typed and with no computers it just went into a file.
The owner has said in another listing here that the experts are more then welcome to look at everything in person yet no one has gone. "Bad News sells" Are people jealous that someone else found the car? You should be happy that it has been found rather then bad mouthing it when you haven't even looked at it. Maybe I am missing something on this site, why all the negativity? Its not worth anything, just my 2 cents worth. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Did you miss where it was pointed out that the trim tag info he supplied had the wrong body # ? We asked him to post a pic of the trim tag but we never heard back.
__________________
...... |
#5
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
How many trim tags of any ZL1 have been posted on this site?
Quik9r |
#6
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I have a feeling the owner registered another user name.
__________________
Day 2 is Life. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I am NOT THE OWNER. Just confirms the negative attitude on this site. I am sorry I joined. I will unregister as a member.
|
#8
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
My cup is half full.....I have seen very few negative posts on this website [img]<<GRAEMLIN_URL>>/youguysrock.gif[/img]
Ryan [img]<<GRAEMLIN_URL>>/beers.gif[/img]
__________________
1969 Beaumont 350 Auto White Sold 1969 Beaumont 307 Auto Green Sold 1969 Chevelle SS 396-L35 Auto Blue Sold 1969 Oldsmobile Cutlass 'S' Sports Coupe W31 |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
What does that really have to do with anything ? Here is what prompted alot of questions. You posted this pic as the info on the trim tag. That is the wrong body # and it belongs to another ZL1 that has it's trim tag. We asked why and a asked for a real pic of the trim tag since the info you gave is wrong. Nobody has ever attempted to clear it up. Why is that ? If I had the real ZL1 I would sure want this straightened out. Can you answer that ?
![]() |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
To further think on this. The wrong body # would indicate a fake trim tag. A pic of this cars trim tag would go a long long way in proving if the car is real. Or if it is a fake trim tag it would go a long long way in making the car suspect. It can't be that hard to understand why we are asking.
__________________
...... |
![]() |
|
|