Go Back   The Supercar Registry > General Discussion > Member's Rides


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 12-15-2016, 12:24 AM
napa68's Avatar
napa68 napa68 is offline
SCR Sponsor
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Presque Isle, WI
Posts: 3,958
Thanks: 6,145
Thanked 5,784 Times in 1,406 Posts
Default Re: Tim Schuetz;s (NAPA68) not so stock 1967 Nova!

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: novadude</div><div class="ubbcode-body">Not sure I understand the &quot;lot of head to tame down&quot; comment. It's 422 ci. How does that runner CSA compare to a L72 427 rectangular port head? I'll bet it's still a much smaller port to feed the same size engine. If you cam it right, I don't see why you couldn't have a civil engine with those large ports. If it was a 327, that might be a different story. [img]<<GRAEMLIN_URL>>/smile.gif[/img] </div></div>

If the question you are asking is the CC's of the intake port, they are 227's. I believe the L72 840 heads to be in the high 200's if not higher. Certainly, there is more to the puzzle from SBC to BBC (i.e. valve angles)

The size of the engine should help quite a bit as well as the weight of the car.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 12-15-2016, 04:21 PM
novadude novadude is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: PA
Posts: 739
Thanks: 3
Thanked 49 Times in 35 Posts
Default Re: Tim Schuetz;s (NAPA68) not so stock 1967 Nova!

You cannot compare runner cc's from different engine families, as port lengths are different. The engine response to CSA (cross sectional area) changes. It doesn't really care about cc's. cc's are just a convenient way to compare CSA changes, since the cylinder head intake port length is relatively fixed for a given engine family.

My point was that the cross sectional area of the BBC L72 head is HUGE compared to even a large aftermarket SBC head. No reason why a 422 SBC with a 227 cc head can't be as &quot;civil&quot; as a L72 427 BBC with even larger ports. [img]<<GRAEMLIN_URL>>/wink.gif[/img]

Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 12-14-2016, 12:56 PM
cook_dw's Avatar
cook_dw cook_dw is offline
Yenko Contributing Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 4,391
Thanks: 674
Thanked 1,736 Times in 662 Posts
Default Re: Tim Schuetz;s (NAPA68) not so stock 1967 Nova!

65 or 75cc chambers? I dont think the heads will be the issue as you can make them work with the right cam. Did you get a wear pattern on the gear during install? Also I assume you are running a cam button.. Couple other things.. When you pull the cam look at the gear. Does it have any burrs or sharp edges? That'll eat one up too. Also have you tried a slip collar distributor? Just curious if the block and/or intake stack up could be off and causing the gear failure.. Just throwing out ideas.. Its a really sweet ride and looks amazing. [img]<<GRAEMLIN_URL>>/biggthumpup.gif[/img]
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 12-15-2016, 12:30 AM
napa68's Avatar
napa68 napa68 is offline
SCR Sponsor
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Presque Isle, WI
Posts: 3,958
Thanks: 6,145
Thanked 5,784 Times in 1,406 Posts
Default Re: Tim Schuetz;s (NAPA68) not so stock 1967 Nova!

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: cook_dw</div><div class="ubbcode-body">65 or 75cc chambers? I dont think the heads will be the issue as you can make them work with the right cam. Did you get a wear pattern on the gear during install? Also I assume you are running a cam button.. Couple other things.. When you pull the cam look at the gear. Does it have any burrs or sharp edges? That'll eat one up too. Also have you tried a slip collar distributor? Just curious if the block and/or intake stack up could be off and causing the gear failure.. Just throwing out ideas.. Its a really sweet ride and looks amazing. [img]<<GRAEMLIN_URL>>/biggthumpup.gif[/img] </div></div>

I cannot remember the size of the chambers Darrell. I'd have to look it up. The compression measured out to a calculated 10.6:1.

The pattern on the gear is good. It has a button in the timing cover and the &quot;walk&quot; was measured when it was built. It looks like there are more options that I did not know about (cam cores and distributor gears) when I wrote that reply. I can get a better core from Comp that will work with a melonized distributor gear. That should solve everything.

The wear on the bronze gear is normal from what I am told. I just hate seeing all of that crap float in the oil.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 12-15-2016, 12:31 AM
napa68's Avatar
napa68 napa68 is offline
SCR Sponsor
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Presque Isle, WI
Posts: 3,958
Thanks: 6,145
Thanked 5,784 Times in 1,406 Posts
Default Re: Tim Schuetz;s (NAPA68) not so stock 1967 Nova!

Thanks for the kind words guys. I am enjoying myself working on this car again.

Tim
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 12-19-2016, 03:01 PM
miket1 miket1 is offline
Yenko Contributing Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Southern IL
Posts: 519
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Send a message via ICQ to miket1
Default Re: Tim Schuetz;s (NAPA68) not so stock 1967 Nova!

Tim, this car should get into the very low 10's w/ a pair of slicks on.
Looks great

Mike
__________________
69 Z28 Burgandy
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 01-15-2017, 03:49 PM
napa68's Avatar
napa68 napa68 is offline
SCR Sponsor
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Presque Isle, WI
Posts: 3,958
Thanks: 6,145
Thanked 5,784 Times in 1,406 Posts
Default Re: Tim Schuetz;s (NAPA68) not so stock 1967 Nova!

I'm working on the Nova this morning, getting ready to get the motor out...............and I'm about as far as I can go as I wait for someone to help me lift it out.

Not much I can do so, in lieu of getting into the beer, I'll post some pics.................





Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 01-15-2017, 04:10 PM
napa68's Avatar
napa68 napa68 is offline
SCR Sponsor
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Presque Isle, WI
Posts: 3,958
Thanks: 6,145
Thanked 5,784 Times in 1,406 Posts
Default Re: Tim Schuetz;s (NAPA68) not so stock 1967 Nova!

Parts have started to roll in. The hydraulic clutch set up, I frankly was never happy with. It always seeped brake fluid, and did not allow me to adjust the clutch as it wore (I probably have been a bit rough on the clutch [img]<<GRAEMLIN_URL>>/[/img])

I found this set up the mounts the slave like they do in the 1st and 2nd gen F bodies, should be much stronger than what I have mounted to the firewall.



I also found this slave set up. Rather than the slave in the bell housing, this mounts to 2 of the bell housing bolts...............and then utilizes a conventional fork and thus, adjustable.



I am going move away from a fixed proportioning valve, and install an adjustable for the rear brakes. This will allow me to clean up the plumbing as well. These 1st and 2nd gen Nova's are difficult to get full throttle out of. This Lokar pedal in a nice clean install and will solve any operational issues.

Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 01-15-2017, 04:19 PM
Plowman's Avatar
Plowman Plowman is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Roslyn, PA
Posts: 1,704
Thanks: 0
Thanked 5 Times in 5 Posts
Default Re: Tim Schuetz;s (NAPA68) not so stock 1967 Nova!

Had to do cable pedal too.
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 01-15-2017, 05:55 PM
napa68's Avatar
napa68 napa68 is offline
SCR Sponsor
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Presque Isle, WI
Posts: 3,958
Thanks: 6,145
Thanked 5,784 Times in 1,406 Posts
Default Re: Tim Schuetz;s (NAPA68) not so stock 1967 Nova!

I found my victim here this morning......................Actually, Tracey helps me with this rather often.

She was actually glued to the Fezell cars (I DVR'ed the Saturday coverage)





And were out!

Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 10:59 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.

O Garage vBulletin Plugins by Drive Thru Online, Inc.