Go Back   The Supercar Registry > General Discussion > Supercar/Musclecar Discussion


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 03-28-2011, 04:28 AM
Kurt S Kurt S is offline
Yenko Contributing Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Ann Arbor, MI
Posts: 3,105
Thanks: 2
Thanked 811 Times in 374 Posts
Default Re: 71 COPO Nova LS6

The GM letter is a fake. They couldn't tell the VIN before the car was produced. And if there's no warranty, then why have a POP?
__________________
Kurt S - CRG
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 03-28-2011, 05:14 PM
TDW TDW is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Michigan USA
Posts: 1,951
Thanks: 29
Thanked 39 Times in 23 Posts
Default Re: 71 COPO Nova LS6

I don't think anyone at GM would type a letter that has all words starting with a capital letter. That letter is a joke.
__________________
Tony
55 Nomad Gasser
70 SS 427 Nova
34 Ford Sedan..Hemi powered
Michigan/ Florida
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 03-28-2011, 05:34 PM
al8apex al8apex is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Scottsdale, AZ
Posts: 1,993
Thanks: 25
Thanked 10 Times in 10 Posts
Default Re: 71 COPO Nova LS6

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: TDW</div><div class="ubbcode-body">I don't think anyone at GM would type a letter that has all words starting with a capital letter. That letter is a joke. </div></div>

the same all caps theme was carried to the note at the bottom of the sales agreement

PT Barnum said it best ...
__________________
Jim R
Scottsdale, AZ

Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 03-28-2011, 06:33 PM
mockingbird812's Avatar
mockingbird812 mockingbird812 is offline
Yenko Contributing Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Dayton
Posts: 14,416
Thanks: 912
Thanked 805 Times in 488 Posts
Default Re: 71 COPO Nova LS6

Ah it don't take much to get ol' Schonye goin'![img]<<GRAEMLIN_URL>>/naughty.gif[/img] [img]<<GRAEMLIN_URL>>/wink.gif[/img]

No need to ban Schonye - way too much entertainment value!! [img]<<GRAEMLIN_URL>>/youguysrock.gif[/img]
__________________
Sam...

Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 03-29-2011, 02:44 AM
69 Post Sedan's Avatar
69 Post Sedan 69 Post Sedan is offline
Yenko Contributing Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Janesville, WI
Posts: 3,579
Thanks: 1,091
Thanked 497 Times in 177 Posts
Default Re: 71 COPO Nova LS6

The auction ended early. Big surprise.... [img]<<GRAEMLIN_URL>>/rolleyes.gif[/img]

Kurt
__________________

1969 SS396 Post Sedan Delivered to Van-T Topeka KS
MCACN Day2 Concourse Gold Award

1965 VW El Lobo Dune Buggy built in the mid 70’s for the Iowa Shriners

1968 Schwinn Orange Krate
1969 Schwinn Pea Picker
1968 Schwinn 5-Speed
1970 Schwinn 3-Speed Deluxe
1972 Schwinn 10-Speed Continental
1973 Schwinn 5-Speed Suburban
All Original Paint Bikes
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 03-29-2011, 03:00 AM
talwell talwell is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: New York
Posts: 397
Thanks: 7
Thanked 41 Times in 12 Posts
Default Re: 71 COPO Nova LS6

That trim tag looks very suspect - the stamping depth appears way too deep and crisp for some of them while others appear acceptable.

Was GM ever known to create one off cars that were warranty exempt? How could this drivetrain have even been certified? Why would GM ever do this for this unknown person?

Also, given the pad stamp of T0212CPS - why would GM have assembled this LS6 motor in February given the production order clearance letter is dated in March? Does this mean that they were building and assembling these motors for the Nova application but not another is known to exist?
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 03-29-2011, 04:01 AM
Mr. Chevy's Avatar
Mr. Chevy Mr. Chevy is offline
Yenko Contributing Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Northern Ohio
Posts: 4,616
Thanks: 286
Thanked 706 Times in 349 Posts
Default Re: 71 COPO Nova LS6

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: talwell</div><div class="ubbcode-body">That trim tag looks very suspect - the stamping depth appears way too deep and crisp for some of them while others appear acceptable.

Was GM ever known to create one off cars that were warranty exempt? How could this drivetrain have even been certified? Why would GM ever do this for this unknown person?

Also, given the pad stamp of T0212CPS - why would GM have assembled this LS6 motor in February given the production order clearance letter is dated in March? Does this mean that they were building and assembling these motors for the Nova application but not another is known to exist? </div></div>

There is just 1 answer to everything Todd, and that is that this car is all [img]<<GRAEMLIN_URL>>/bs.gif[/img] [img]<<GRAEMLIN_URL>>/bs.gif[/img] [img]<<GRAEMLIN_URL>>/bs.gif[/img] [img]<<GRAEMLIN_URL>>/bs.gif[/img] [img]<<GRAEMLIN_URL>>/bs.gif[/img]

You absolutely right about the trim tag.. That's what I was looking at.. Plus look at all the marking around the perimeter of it.. Looks like the original one was scraped off and this one put on.....

Rich
__________________
"This is Sheriff Buford T. Justice, I'm in pursuit of a black Trans Am, he is all mine so stay out of the way"
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 03-29-2011, 08:10 PM
442w30 442w30 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Gabba Gabba Hey! NYC
Posts: 2,531
Thanks: 219
Thanked 148 Times in 73 Posts
Default Re: 71 COPO Nova LS6

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: talwell</div><div class="ubbcode-body">
Was GM ever known to create one off cars that were warranty exempt? How could this drivetrain have even been certified? Why would GM ever do this for this unknown person?
</div></div>

I was under the impression that if a car wasn't registered with the AMA, then it wasn't certified to be built:

http://www.gmheritagecenter.com/gm-h...rolet-Nova.pdf

Can't say I've worded this correctly, but maybe someone can add?
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 03-29-2011, 09:16 PM
StealthBird StealthBird is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 1,127
Thanks: 1
Thanked 95 Times in 43 Posts
Default Re: 71 COPO Nova LS6

There were actually a few LS6 Novas built by Jim Wangers Chevrolet (the same Jim Wangers of Pontiac fame) in 1973. Wangers bought a couple dozen LS6 crate engines and offered them as a conversion in the Chevelle, Nova, and Camaro. In Wanger's book &quot;Glory Days&quot;, he describes how he got into a lot of trouble with the EPA.

Jim Wangers complied with the EPA laws. He had buyers of LS6 conversion cars sign an affidavit stating that the vehicle would be used off-road only. In order to circumvent the strict EPA policy that a dealer could not tamper with ANY emissions devices on a new car, Wangers would have a buyer buy their car, drive it around the block, then bring it into the Service Dept. That allowed him to get around the strict EPA policy of tampering with new vehicle emissions equipment, because technically, the car was no longer &quot;new&quot;.

Then one day a young couple bought a new 1973 Nova 350, and had Wangers Chevrolet drop in an LS6. Under the terms of the agreement, the owners had to trailer the car off the lot, (which they did), and they signed the affidavit that it would be used for off-road use only. Wangers also took pictures of every LS6 conversion car he sold, sitting on the owners trailer, just to make sure.

But a few months later, the couple got divorced, and the wife got the Nova in the settlement. When she went to get it registered, it failed state inspection. She talked to a lawyer, and the lawyer demanded that Wangers Chevrolet buy back the LS6 Nova, or replace the LS6 engine with the original 350, then reinstall all the emission equipment. Wangers refused, citing he had the signed affidavit and an agreement that the car was to be used off-road only.

The lawyer contacted the EPA. The EPA was not amused, and after investigating, they fined Wangers $500,000 (around $4 million in today's dollars), which was an outrageous amount of money for a dealership to pay. Wangers decided to fight it.

The EPA was already upset with stories coming in from all around the country about dealerships removing emission equipment, from AMC to Chevy, Mopar to Ford. Many high-perf fans still wanted that pre-1971, high octane horsepower, and disliked EGR valves, charcoal canisters, and 87 octane unleaded. So the EPA decided to make an example out of Wangers Chevrolet. Wangers name was well-known in automotive circles, he was the father of the iconic GTO, and hard-core auto enthusiasts knew about Royal Pontiac from the 1960's days.

Wangers could not afford to pay $500,000, so he agreed to be a scapegoat for the EPA. For a much softer fine of $500.00, he agreed to reinstall the woman's 350 engine, and stop performing engine transplants. The EPA blasted the story across every media outlet they could find in order to discourage other dealerships from tampering with emissions.

[img]<<GRAEMLIN_URL>>/beers.gif[/img]
__________________
1959-1980 Pontiac Window Sticker Reproductions : PontiacWindowStickers.com

DVD's for Musclecar fans! MusclecarFilms.com
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 03-29-2011, 04:59 AM
kwhizz kwhizz is offline
Yenko Contributing Member
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: LS Make'um Better Guy
Posts: 7,747
Thanks: 864
Thanked 683 Times in 202 Posts
Default Re: 71 COPO Nova LS6

Looks like this one fell out of the sky and right into the Toilet.............
__________________


The Best things in life......Aren't Things
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 11:43 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.

O Garage vBulletin Plugins by Drive Thru Online, Inc.