![]() Dedicated to the Promotion and Preservation of American Muscle Cars, Dealer built Supercars and COPO cars. |
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: bwag</div><div class="ubbcode-body">Your car would have been a COPO order to get the 4.56 gears from the fsctory....Bob </div></div>
A 4.56 posi would have been an RPO order. What makes you think it's anything COPO?
__________________
Follow me on Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/mbcgarage/ |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
The 4.56 and 4.88 gears were ordered with RPO 84 linked to COPO 9511
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: bwag</div><div class="ubbcode-body">The 4.56 and 4.88 gears were ordered with RPO 84 linked to COPO 9511 </div></div>
So if I ordered any '69 Camaro with a 4.56 or 4.88 geared diff I would have to order a COPO option?
__________________
Follow me on Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/mbcgarage/ |
#4
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Is that also true for a 1969 Chevelle? Was there a special Copo for 4:56 gears?
Ryan
__________________
1969 Beaumont 350 Auto White Sold 1969 Beaumont 307 Auto Green Sold 1969 Chevelle SS 396-L35 Auto Blue Sold 1969 Oldsmobile Cutlass 'S' Sports Coupe W31 |
#5
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Any L78 Chime is a good Chime.
Ryan
__________________
1969 Beaumont 350 Auto White Sold 1969 Beaumont 307 Auto Green Sold 1969 Chevelle SS 396-L35 Auto Blue Sold 1969 Oldsmobile Cutlass 'S' Sports Coupe W31 |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
My 05C 4:88 had a Feb date code.
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Bob,
Thanks for clearing this up. Yes, to get a 4.56 or 4.88 in a Camaro, it was a COPO order. Comparing it to other models / years isn't really a valid comparison since the ordering method changed. The data on other 69's says this axle date was *way* off - I've always been surprised by how close the dates are on some unusual components in 69.
__________________
Kurt S - CRG |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Kurt S</div><div class="ubbcode-body">Bob,
Thanks for clearing this up. Yes, to get a 4.56 or 4.88 in a Camaro, it was a COPO order. Comparing it to other models / years isn't really a valid comparison since the ordering method changed. The data on other 69's says this axle date was *way* off - I've always been surprised by how close the dates are on some unusual components in 69.</div></div> Is this true for a 1968 ordered car??? For a 4.56/4.88 rear axle it had to be a COPO order??? Or only a 1969 ordered car?? Thanks in advance |
#9
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Thanks for explaining the rear end situation Gents
Always impressed with the knowledge around here!
__________________
Follow me on Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/mbcgarage/ |
#10
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Yup.....they sure were. Stamped high impact.
![]() Of course, not High Impact enough for Ol Yeller's 7400, 1st to 2nd upshiftsthough! LOLOLOL ![]()
__________________
Jersey Jeff 69 Day-2 L89 T400 BX 2015 ZL-1 Auto 98 Surburban |
![]() |
|
|