![]() Dedicated to the Promotion and Preservation of American Muscle Cars, Dealer built Supercars and COPO cars. |
|
Register | Album Gallery | Thread Gallery | FAQ | Community | Calendar | Become a Paid Member | Today's Posts | Search |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
![]() <div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: clem</div><div class="ubbcode-body">...I am not good at going back on computers but some can bring up the original posts on www.camaro.org...</div></div> Camaro.net thread, click here... http://www.camaros.net/forums/showthread.php?t=207776 Thanks for your responses to my thoughts earlier Clem! [img]<<GRAEMLIN_URL>>/beers.gif[/img] ~ Pete
__________________
I like real cars best...especially the REAL real ones! |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I guess I am still wondering why the original owner would have any reason to lie about the color? I can't see where he has any stake in this, so why would we have any reason not to believe him?
I can say FOR SURE that original paint 1965 EO lacquer seems to be a much lighter, more silvery hue than what you get today spraying PPG base/clear. We had my Dad's urethane base/clear EO Nova near an original paint EO car at one point, and the original paint car looked silver by comparison. Much lighter, and less purple. |
The Following User Says Thank You to novadude For This Useful Post: | ||
bdk1976 (08-21-2022) |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: novadude</div><div class="ubbcode-body">I guess I am still wondering why the original owner would have any reason to lie about the color? I can't see where he has any stake in this, so why would we have any reason not to believe him?
I can say FOR SURE that original paint 1965 EO lacquer seems to be a much lighter, more silvery hue than what you get today spraying PPG base/clear. We had my Dad's urethane base/clear EO Nova near an original paint EO car at one point, and the original paint car looked silver by comparison. Much lighter, and less purple. </div></div> Great post.
__________________
1968 Camaro Ex-ISCA Show Car - Sold ![]() On The Lookout For My Next Classic... John 10:30 |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: novadude</div><div class="ubbcode-body">I guess I am still wondering why the original owner would have any reason to lie about the color? I can't see where he has any stake in this, so why would we have any reason not to believe him?
I can say FOR SURE that original paint 1965 EO lacquer seems to be a much lighter, more silvery hue than what you get today spraying PPG base/clear. We had my Dad's urethane base/clear EO Nova near an original paint EO car at one point, and the original paint car looked silver by comparison. Much lighter, and less purple. </div></div>it is CYA time for the experts. if they can't get the color correct what about the other stuff on the car ??? |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: novadude</div><div class="ubbcode-body">I guess I am still wondering why the original owner would have any reason to lie about the color? I can't see where he has any stake in this, so why would we have any reason not to believe him?
I can say FOR SURE that original paint 1965 EO lacquer seems to be a much lighter, more silvery hue than what you get today spraying PPG base/clear. We had my Dad's urethane base/clear EO Nova near an original paint EO car at one point, and the original paint car looked silver by comparison. Much lighter, and less purple. </div></div> At no time has anyone been accused of lying. As stated I do not question the car was ordered in EO. He has every reason to believe it was EO. Unlike yourself and many of the others I actually saw the original paint on this car. I have ample reason to believe it wasn't. All this talk of bc/cc variation is bs. Were that true every car restored in bc/cc wouldn't look original. Since I actually saw the OE paint nothing I have read here will convince me that car was EO. Feel free to continue convincing yourselves it was.
__________________
Learning more and more about less and less... |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
It is a light hue...OEM. E-O (Pastel )
The NASCAR 65 IMPALA pictured here is a perfect example of a "mix in non lacquer". 50 years removed. That pics show a deeper darker pigment. Clear coat in lacquer or enamel changes any color of base ....typically darkens it up.
__________________
Day Two Specialties /High Quality Muscle Car Parts. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
William,
Have you ever met a guy from the Fisher Body division at Norwood who sprayed out of a paint pot? |
#8
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Indigo colors are the most unstable colors in the paint spectrum.
Add years of sunlight,or flo lights,and so many temperature differences since then,and I could see how some may be mis-lead thinking it came silver. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Mr70</div><div class="ubbcode-body">Indigo colors are the most unstable colors in the paint spectrum.
Add years of sunlight,or flo lights,and so many temperature differences since then,and I could see how some may be mis-lead thinking it came silver. </div></div>yes this true but why keep on insisting it was not EO after the original owner shows up with other people who have seen the car say it was EO. someone made a mistake but will not admit to it. all that has to be done is to say we made a mistake and the color was EO and this will be over. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
William,
What parts were painted EO that should not have been painted? |
![]() |
|
|