![]() Dedicated to the Promotion and Preservation of American Muscle Cars, Dealer built Supercars and COPO cars. |
|
Register | Album Gallery | Thread Gallery | FAQ | Community | Calendar | Become a Paid Member | Today's Posts | Search |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I am thinking a small percenatge of "old school" Camaro enthusiasts (i.e. 1 & 2nd Gen anyway) will actually, go out and buy a new Camaro. Just because its new and has the CAMARO name, isnt enough for me to spend ?$?$?$.
I'm certain that the deep pocket crowd, will buy the LS2 or LS7 version IF and when that ever gets built, how many more years into the future. G.M. cant be expected to stay in business or profit on the "few" LS7 Camaros it might make. It will probably take the younger crowd to go out and buy these new Camaros to turn any sales numbers. I sure hope these design and marketing guru's have there act together........
__________________
Chuck Sharin [email protected] Auburn,WA (30 miles South of Seattle) 70 Camaro R/S Z-28, L-78, R/S SS 69 Camaro COPO "recreation" |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
http://cgi.ebay.com/ebaymotors/FIRST-08-...1QQcmdZViewItem
Be the envy of all the other kids your block,only 25k over and a short wait till the end of the decade! Hmmm..how many Challengers can they sell in two years ![]() As Harry Caray used to state so eloquently when opposing teams hit em where they weren't- "ball drops,run scores." |
#13
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
The retro thing is old news and I don't think it will fly for the Camaro.
If GM does their normal thing it will be too expensive, too heavy and too late. The show car isn't crisp enough, its too blocky and the grille looks stupid in my opinion. They need to make it light, fast, sharp and with enough owner choosable options to make each one unique.
__________________
2012 ZL1 black M6 1968 L36 4 spd Biscayne 1957 270 hp Corvette |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Theres no future in building a car that a bunch of 40 year old white guys like. The mustang is due for restyling in 08 and is moving away from the retro look. my hope is that they get the average 16-25 old to buy one and keep the build quality and cool factor high so that they can keep customers for life and keep the lineage going. We need strong manufacturing companies in this country so the profits don't go overseas. Our muscle cars heritage will be gone otherwise.
Anyone on this board collecting Kaiser, Hupmobile or Hudson?
__________________
Howard Growing old is a certainty, growing up isn't |
#15
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I really like the new Camaro. If you want great all around performance and new technology in a 69 camaro build a resto mod or pro-touring car, or have someone build it for you. The NEW camaro does have some historical roots but it's a new beginning and will sink or swim on it's own merit.
__________________
Steve Shauger The Supercar Registry www.yenko.net Vintage Certification™ , Providing Recognition to Unrestored Muscle Cars. Website: www.vintagecertification.com |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
This car reminds me of the phrase "you can't go home again." The problem really is that there are many sedans in the range that the Camaro needs to be priced at that will perform at 9/10 of it's capability RIGHT NOW. Seeing the numbers on the new 335i (twin turbo) BMW, the Camaro may even be outperformed, because by 2009, the other manufacturers will up the ante to try to catch it. Also, GM says it will be like the concept, but when has that ever happened? There's still time to completely ruin what's there by tacking on spoilers and doo-dads, and what's there isn't exactly the sweetest package I've ever seen anyway...
Look at the catastrophic failure that is/was the GTO. Even with a bona-fide world-beater that is equipped with a high-tech suspension and hot-rod heart, they can't give those things away (ok, that's an exaggeration, but...). I took my wife to look at the GTO in 2004, and she was about as interested in it as going to the dentist. What does that tell you? It tells me that buyers are more sophisticated than GM gives them credit for being-- That cars can no longer be one-dimensional, and that having 400 hp doesn't allow you to take a bunch of poorly-executed shortcuts. Aaah, GM... Guess what-- It's no longer 1970. Maybe GM should change the corporate name to Rip Van Winkle? |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I wonder if the interest is in the car it self (if any other name would it still have this much attention), or is it that they're resurecting the "Camaro" name?. Personally i think it's the fact that the Camaro is coming back, i could do without the car, i think by the time it comes out the hype will be over and the car will be a disapointment.
|
#18
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Personally, I like the new Camaro however, It's my opinion that GM could have done more with it. IMO Keith is on target with plans for the Oshawa plant and hopefully GM will use this platform to bring back a retro Chevelle or other retro Chevy muscle. I believe that GM's "alway's late" problem stems from to many exec's and CEO's paying more attention to their paydays then they are to the competition. It's obvious GM does not particpate in corporate spying. Time to wake up with the sunrise GM, don't wait for the stars to come out.
__________________
"I never think of the future. It comes soon enough." - Albert Einstein |
#19
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
The more posts I read about this, the more I can't help but
think that GM will miss the "whole retro thing" by 2009. I'm sick of it already ! Once it runs its course, it will fizzle. And - that's exactly when the new Camaro will debut! ![]()
__________________
![]() |
#20
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Will there be a convertible? I hate the whole "convertible comes out 2 years later" thing like with the C5 vette.
Tommy M |
![]() |
|
|