![]() Dedicated to the Promotion and Preservation of American Muscle Cars, Dealer built Supercars and COPO cars. |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I know of a pace car that now has a LS6 in it
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Two more makes seven correct. There are more L-88's and more ZL1's then 67 4k convertibles. Is there another GM muscle car with so few examples existing today.
__________________
67 RS/SS L-78 Convertible 62 Bubble Top 409-409 66 SS Nova L-79 |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: vette5762</div><div class="ubbcode-body">Two more makes seven correct. There are more L-88's and more ZL1's then 67 4k convertibles. Is there another GM muscle car with so few examples existing today.</div></div>
There are fewer known 66 and 67 L78 Chevelle convertibles known today. I believe the number of documented 66 L78 Convertibles known is 3. I have never seen a real documented 67 L78 Chevelle convertible but one is apparently scheduled to run through Mecum. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: vette5762</div><div class="ubbcode-body">Two more makes seven correct. There are more L-88's and more ZL1's then 67 4k convertibles. Is there another GM muscle car with so few examples existing today. </div></div>
How about a 1967 Camaro convertible L89 ? |
#5
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Vortecpro</div><div class="ubbcode-body">
How about a 1967 Camaro convertible L89 ? </div></div> Anyone know of the one in this below 1994 ad and if a real L89 car? It's L78 week over on the old newspaper ads thread, L78 'Verts galore also lots more saved still to post. https://www.yenko.net/ubbthreads/ubbt...pics/683566/30 [img]<<GRAEMLIN_URL>>/beers.gif[/img] ~ Pete - ![]() -
__________________
I like real cars best...especially the REAL real ones! |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Forgot Chris P's Bat Car that makes eight.
__________________
67 RS/SS L-78 Convertible 62 Bubble Top 409-409 66 SS Nova L-79 |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
[img]https://www.yenko.net/ubbthreads/pics/use...789_4460491_n.j[/img]
Bat car as raced I prefer this version. [img]<<GRAEMLIN_URL>>/ ![]()
__________________
Bernard |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Had a Marina Blue Blue Deluxe int 67 RS SS L78 Convert a few years back . Born with engine , replacement trans original 4:10 rear . Had headers on it and was a good driver condition car with an older restoration ..
|
#9
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
'
Considering the '67 L78 Trim Tag designation, you'd think the survival rate percentage of cars built would be higher for 67's than 69's...both being equal w/ other factors such as verifiable Original Components/Stampings/Paperwork/Pop's etc? [img]<<GRAEMLIN_URL>>/hmmm.gif[/img] ~ Pete
__________________
I like real cars best...especially the REAL real ones! |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Pete,
I agree that a higher percentage of '67s have to be known because of the trim tag call out. With 1138 L78s produced we'd know of many more rags if they represented 10% of production. It seems in the higher performance engines that a lower % of rags is the norm. Factor that with a higher survival rate of rags and my guess is that fewer than 5% were built. It could even be much lower than that. Lets estimate 25 known cars and an 80% survival rate and you end up with a production number less than 3%. Of course it's all guess work but it seems pretty clear that the '67 L78 rags are some of the rarest high performance cars of the era. |
![]() |
|
|