Go Back   The Supercar Registry > General Discussion > Lounge


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11  
Old 06-07-2015, 05:33 PM
PeteLeathersac's Avatar
PeteLeathersac PeteLeathersac is offline
Yenko Contributing Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: O' Canada
Posts: 12,138
Thanks: 15,882
Thanked 4,881 Times in 2,214 Posts
Default Re: Muscle Car Review issue needed


Very cool subject Verne!
Other than restored as one, it'd be nice to see anything pre resto or whatever is available that indisputably proves the RK example is indeed one of THE original Zora Biscaynes.
Also, what's the added tag seen on the interior of the driver's side A-Pillar... fleet # tag?
Here's the Zora pic again but in one piece...love the Chevrolet Engineering/Tests sign!
[img]<<GRAEMLIN_URL>>/beers.gif[/img]
~ Pete

Motor Trend Dec/58 issue on eBay...
http://www.ebay.com/itm/1958-DECEMBER-MO...-/151697653297?

RK example article/pics...
http://rods-classics.com/content/195...tov-patrol-car

On YouTube...
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=BV-HGx1O1oU

==================








__________________
I like real cars best...especially the REAL real ones!
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 06-07-2015, 06:13 PM
Verne_Frantz Verne_Frantz is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Central New Jersey
Posts: 3,793
Thanks: 34
Thanked 236 Times in 121 Posts
Default Re: Muscle Car Review issue needed

My guess is that the tag is a Property Tag. The number is far too high for a car number and it's definitely not a GM tag for an F&amp;SO number. Everything the department owned probably had a property number, right down to the typewriters.
As far as the Duntov connection, it's hard to say since the only piece that he was supposedly involved with was the engine build. Everything else is stock Police car Body &amp; Chassis equipment. The engine has a standard &quot;F&quot; suffix code which is the 250hp 348 with standard trans. (it's a 3-spd)
The car was supposedly restored in Ca. and the new owner is trying to contact them for more information.
It's just a little side research project that landed in my lap. I've never really looked into those cars before.
Verne [img]<<GRAEMLIN_URL>>/biggthumpup.gif[/img]
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 06-07-2015, 09:03 PM
PeteLeathersac's Avatar
PeteLeathersac PeteLeathersac is offline
Yenko Contributing Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: O' Canada
Posts: 12,138
Thanks: 15,882
Thanked 4,881 Times in 2,214 Posts
Default Re: Muscle Car Review issue needed


I agree not a GM tag Verne and expect some kind of dept or property tag too.
Did you note the link to the Motor Trend mag on eBay or have you found it already?
If not an eBayer, I'm sure someone here can make it happen for you...it's cheap and BIN.
Congrats to the owner and hope all goes well w/ the research, please share more if you can.
[img]<<GRAEMLIN_URL>>/beers.gif[/img]
~ Pete
__________________
I like real cars best...especially the REAL real ones!
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 06-08-2015, 01:42 AM
Verne_Frantz Verne_Frantz is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Central New Jersey
Posts: 3,793
Thanks: 34
Thanked 236 Times in 121 Posts
Default Re: Muscle Car Review issue needed

Well, I'm not sure about the &quot;40 produced&quot; claim. And if the first one was available for the Oct edition of Motor Trend, why were the 2 Known cars built at Oakland at the end of June '59?? I tend to think the two known cars were just regular police cars ordered late in the production year.
After '59 production began, the 305hp 348 was an RPO. 1X4, solid lifter and 11.0CR.

I saw the link. I'm thinking about buying it.

Verne [img]<<GRAEMLIN_URL>>/biggthumpup.gif[/img]
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 09:59 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.

O Garage vBulletin Plugins by Drive Thru Online, Inc.