![]() Dedicated to the Promotion and Preservation of American Muscle Cars, Dealer built Supercars and COPO cars. |
|
Register | Album Gallery | Thread Gallery | FAQ | Community | Calendar | Become a Paid Member | Today's Posts | Search |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
The funny thing is that despite the obvious differences between his tag and trace,his tag looks authenic by comparison when compared to mine,and his trace is the odd duck out. I don't know why somebody would make a fake trace when they have a perfectly good tag to trace. My opinion is that there is nothing to make me think that his tag is fake. I would accept it as real based on font and letter spacing. I do own 3 Norwood built 2nd Gens and one LA built later 2nd gen and probably have owned another 20 on top of that.Just my $.02. Like I said,I have no skin in this and don't know the car or the guy in any way. Just trying to help.
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
This is a very interesting discussion, I have access to a atomic particle identification laser machine and I had the offending VIN pictures analyzed and the results are very surprizing. It appears that in both rubbing photos a normal lead pencil was NOT used to make the rubbings. Until we find out what type of pencils were used we will never know if the "9"s are real or not!
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
That's pretty interesting.......I've never heard of assessing atomic particles within the contents of imagery...........you must have both physical rubbings in your possession in order to assess atomic particles. Perhaps your Flux Capacitor needs a tune up?
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Great Scott Marty!
__________________
Don't believe everything you read on the internet ... Ben Franklin |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
<object width="425" height="350"> <param name="movie" value="https://www.youtube.com/v/CgFBSDoXW5s"></param> <param name="wmode" value="transparent"></param> <embed src="https://www.youtube.com/v/CgFBSDoXW5s" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" wmode="transparent" width="425" height="350"> </embed></object>
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Oh great...
__________________
...... |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
No replies to this? Darn.
Jason |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Who's Zed and what's an L-1?
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
After a few zed l-1s, I had to quit watching!
__________________
Bill |
#10
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Back to the facts for a moment, more than one car may be wearing ZL1 #48's identity and the fraud car w/ wrong body # & bogus tags sold @ the 2013 Toronto auction may be only one of them? Again some 'lost' ZL1's still have legal owners/insurance co's that could lay claim to cars bearing these identities so spending $ on any vehicle these #'s are affixed to could quickly become a very costly venture? [img]<<GRAEMLIN_URL>>/thumbsdown.gif[/img] ~ Pete
__________________
I like real cars best...especially the REAL real ones! |
![]() |
|
|