Go Back   The Supercar Registry > Dealer Specific Discussion > Fred Gibb Chevrolet


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 01-30-2006, 03:39 AM
yellowjudge yellowjudge is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Pittsburgh, Pa
Posts: 243
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default Re: Fred Gibb trademark ZL 1

I just picked up a vintage 1969 mag. It shows a ZL 1 camaro, & it has a ZL 1 emblem in the grille. Was that standard on these cars? I'm a firebird guy.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 01-30-2006, 04:05 AM
JChlupsa JChlupsa is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: KS
Posts: 7,627
Thanks: 0
Thanked 6 Times in 6 Posts
Default Re: Fred Gibb trademark ZL 1

can you share that article and pics
__________________
IF YOU DON'T STAND BEHIND OUR TROOPS,
PLEASE, FEEL FREE TO STAND IN FRONT OF THEM !!!
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 01-30-2006, 04:14 AM
markjohnson's Avatar
markjohnson markjohnson is offline
Yenko Contributing Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: STL, MO.
Posts: 2,481
Thanks: 255
Thanked 570 Times in 229 Posts
Default Re: Fred Gibb trademark ZL 1

That has to be that well-photographed black with gold trim GM press car. I want to say it had four wheel disc brakes and a lower compression ratio for street driving. De-tuned a little for street use compared to the radicalness (is that a word?) of the regular 69 ZL-1 race cars. Shame it never made production. Martin Schorr released a book back in the eighties that had several pictures of it.
__________________
1962 Biscayne O-21669 MKIV/M-22
1962 Bel Air Sport Coupe 409/1,000
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 01-30-2006, 09:10 PM
yellowjudge yellowjudge is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Pittsburgh, Pa
Posts: 243
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default Re: Fred Gibb trademark ZL 1

Hi, I could take a pic.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 01-31-2006, 12:12 AM
amuseme amuseme is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: White Hall, Illinois
Posts: 62
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default Re: Fred Gibb trademark ZL 1

Seems to me that if DP had been a better driver/businessman, he wouldn't have to leach others' fame. Yes, I know it's not all one persons doing, that's just the opinion I've come to from the feel of all this. Hell, I could be wrong!
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 01-31-2006, 12:40 AM
sYc sYc is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Alton, MO, USA
Posts: 8,578
Thanks: 3
Thanked 404 Times in 91 Posts
Default Re: Fred Gibb trademark ZL 1

[ QUOTE ]
Seems to me that if DP had been a better driver/businessman, he wouldn't have to leach others' fame. Yes, I know it's not all one persons doing, that's just the opinion I've come to from the feel of all this. Hell, I could be wrong!

[/ QUOTE ]

Your opinion seems to be in the majority.
__________________
Tom Clary
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 01-31-2006, 12:55 AM
YENKO DEUCE REGISTRY's Avatar
YENKO DEUCE REGISTRY YENKO DEUCE REGISTRY is offline
Yenko Contributing Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: PA
Posts: 13,097
Thanks: 720
Thanked 360 Times in 144 Posts
Default Re: Fred Gibb trademark ZL 1

[ QUOTE ]
Seems to me that if DP had been a better driver/businessman, he wouldn't have to leach others' fame. Yes, I know it's not all one persons doing, that's just the opinion I've come to from the feel of all this. Hell, I could be wrong!

[/ QUOTE ]

You nailed it.

__________________
Marlin
70 Yenko Nova-350/360, 4speed M21, 4.10 Posi (Daddy's Ride)
69 SS Nova-396/375hp, 4speed M20, 3.55 Posi (Benjamin's Ride)
67 RS Camaro-327/250hp, 2speed Glide, & 3.08 Open (Danny's Ride)
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 02-21-2006, 11:46 PM
bowtie3168 bowtie3168 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Lincroft, New Jersey, USA
Posts: 360
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default Re: Fred Gibb trademark

What's the difference between a cat fish and a lawyer and a catfish? One is a bottem feeding scavenger and the other is a fish
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 02-23-2006, 07:55 AM
TXSS TXSS is offline
Yenko Contributing Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Houston, Texas
Posts: 458
Thanks: 1
Thanked 3 Times in 2 Posts
Default Re: Fred Gibb trademark

Just my .02 but clearly the mark should be controlled by Helen. I know very few of the facts regarding this dispute. However, I have quite a bit of experience with trade marks and the use of trade marks by non-registered users. In 1953 my father developed a gasket material used by NASA. The product was called Fluorogreen and the trade mark was registered and controlled by the company my father worked for. In 1972 he purchased the division that made the Fluorogreen product but the trade mark stayed with the original company. In 1980 that companies assets were liquated and the trade mark went to the bank. We continued to use the trade mark and make the product for the next 15 years. We never thought of registering the mark in our name. Shame on us. Back in the day there had been a gentleman's agreement to allow my father to use the trade mark. A competitor of ours did a searches with the patient and trade mark office and saw that the mark was not registered in our name. Under a secret agreement between the registered owner (a bank) and our competitor, the registered owner (a bank) sold the mark to our competitor and our competitor applied for the registration of the trade mark.

Sorry, but it doesn't work that way.

There are two defining points that determine who owns a trade mark and one of them IS NOT who the registered owner is. The first is whoever controls the mark in commerce owns that mark regardless of who the registered owner is. In-fact we were able to keep the register owner of the trade mark from selling it to our competitor because WE had controlled the mark in commerce for the past 15 years not "The bank" . The second defining point is you have to prefect your claim to the mark. Meaning you have to prevent anyone from using the mark with out your permission. Ask Dupont. They lost control of the trade mark Nylon because they did not prevent others from using it. The Bank had never tried to prevent us from using the mark and had never controlled the mark in commerce so they had no claim to the mark even though they were the registered owner. If Helen can show that she has controlled the mark in commerce then she owns the mark but she also has to show that she has at least tried to prevent Val or anyone else from using it. It's kind of a double edge sword but it's a fair system. I spent three years fighting this battle only to find out that the battle was over before it started. We controlled the mark so we owned the mark ..... period.

Hopefully that's the way it will turn out for Helen.

Rick
__________________
Rick

Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 02-23-2006, 04:26 PM
bowtie3168 bowtie3168 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Lincroft, New Jersey, USA
Posts: 360
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default Re: Fred Gibb trademark

good info
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 01:15 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.

O Garage vBulletin Plugins by Drive Thru Online, Inc.