![]() |
|
Register | Album Gallery | Thread Gallery | FAQ | Community | Calendar | Become a Paid Member | Today's Posts | Search |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#21
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I agree and disagree with this.
First "numbers matching" to a Chevy person generally means the partial VIN on block pad. Hemi Mopars do not have that until 68 on bellhousing area of block. It is on machined pad by oil pan 69- 71. In the 80's when I was very active with Hemi Mopars {18 of them] most loose blocks floating around did not have any partial VIN's on them. You can thank old racers for this as Hemis were- are quite successful at it. Was at the Brainerd NHRA nationals a few years ago and watched John Forces crew freshen a motor up. looked to be a copy of a 426 to me. Numbers- dates being right on all parts was the focus. Ever try to find factory bolts and odd washers for Hemi exhaust manifolds? The odd hardware for attaching intake manifolds? That is my background and why we are such detail freaks about her "OLE BLUE" 69 L78 M22 Chevelle hardtop. Her 68 converts all have 13867 VIN's so not a worry there. Her 68 hardtop is 13837 so no worries there either. The 69 is 13637 like any V-8 Chevelle and the other stuff authenticates it. It is very original and why she bought it. Thought all its little details would be of interest but that does not seem to be the case. Interesting to us though and that is the main point. Agree that more attention is being paid to the "born with" thing on Mopar's. Seems to be more high-end collectors chasing multiple makes nowadays and the "born with" thing is pretty deeply entrenched in Chevyland. Personally, I like pretty much all. Even had a couple 68 AMX 390 4 spd cars. The Hemi phase taught me to look at the dates- numbers minutia. Remember not everyone likes the same thing and that is good. Pics are my current illness!!! Quote:
|
The Following User Says Thank You to daveg For This Useful Post: | ||
dykstra (Today) |
![]() |
|
|