![]() Dedicated to the Promotion and Preservation of American Muscle Cars, Dealer built Supercars and COPO cars. |
|
Register | Album Gallery | Thread Gallery | FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Become a Paid Member | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#21
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Nick, i’m glad you posted here. I was looking for your other post you mentioned to ad to this thread. it’s one of the main reason these problems exist in flat tap at cams. Deviating from the cam core shape when changing centerlines and lobe shapes making hardness treatment very thin in some areas.
If you can find that post it’s worth reposting here. It’s very insightful and worth reading. thanks, Rob. |
#22
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Nick’s post:
The issue IMO is more to do with insufficient case hardened depth on the cam cores being used. The issue is when the case depth on the nose isn't enough and this is magnified because of spring psi being highest at over the nose of the cam, than on the base circle of the cam . Certain companies use the same UGL( unground lobe ) cam cores for a multitude of cam valve events, pt numbers , etc . The issue lies in that you harden the lobes during heat treat, but when you try to cut the more than one cam profile, using multiple centerlines or lobe lift( base circle) on the same core ,you end up grinding away too much or even going through the heat treat in some spots. If the use a specialty UGL for each specific cam then the case depth is set at XX mm of what it needs and you after final grinding you are left with sufficient heat treat depth. We see it all the time here . Thanks |
The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to RobR For This Useful Post: | ||
#23
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
__________________
WOT |
#24
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
|
The Following User Says Thank You to COPO For This Useful Post: | ||
69M22Z (01-26-2024) |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|