Go Back   The Supercar Registry > General Discussion > Supercar/Musclecar Discussion


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 10-18-2021, 05:56 PM
Lee Stewart's Avatar
Lee Stewart Lee Stewart is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2017
Location: ABQ, New Mexico
Posts: 36,633
Thanks: 3,506
Thanked 136,542 Times in 22,784 Posts
Default

IMO . . . GM was still selling 3x2 engines in muscle cars during the 1966 model year: GTO and 442. The Camaro was to debut in Sept. 1966. There was no 396 option. Just the new 350 4bbl. A 3x2 option would offer higher horsepower which the Camaro would need to compete with the new restyled 1967 Mustang's 390/320 HP option.

Then the mandate came where only the Corvette would get 3x2 options and all other GM cars would lose their 3x2 engine options for the 1967 model year. And the SB 3x2 option was cancelled.

It had nothing to do with racing and everything to do with the growing muscle car market.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 10-18-2021, 06:43 PM
William William is offline
Yenko Contributing Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: New Berlin WI USA
Posts: 2,658
Thanks: 253
Thanked 2,912 Times in 811 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Lee Stewart View Post
IMO . . . GM was still selling 3x2 engines in muscle cars during the 1966 model year: GTO and 442. The Camaro was to debut in Sept. 1966. There was no 396 option. Just the new 350 4bbl. A 3x2 option would offer higher horsepower which the Camaro would need to compete with the new restyled 1967 Mustang's 390/320 HP option.

Then the mandate came where only the Corvette would get 3x2 options and all other GM cars would lose their 3x2 engine options for the 1967 model year. And the SB 3x2 option was cancelled.

It had nothing to do with racing and everything to do with the growing muscle car market.
Sounds like a plausible explanation; the GTO lost tri-power for the '67 MY also.

One of these 3 x 2 manifolds turned up at a Pomona swap meet in the '80s. Think that one had a '0-' part number. The L70 was intended to be an option for the Camaro SS350. If it had proven viable, it could have been sold OTC as the cross-ram was.
__________________
Learning more and more about less and less...
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to William For This Useful Post:
Lee Stewart (10-18-2021)
  #3  
Old 10-18-2021, 08:07 PM
rlw68's Avatar
rlw68 rlw68 is offline
Yenko Contributing Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2017
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 352
Thanks: 187
Thanked 276 Times in 116 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by William View Post
Sounds like a plausible explanation; the GTO lost tri-power for the '67 MY also.
Yea but no one writes songs about a Hyundai

__________________
Rob
1969 Camaro Z/28. Norwood 02D. Lemans Blue
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 10-19-2021, 12:49 PM
Lee Stewart's Avatar
Lee Stewart Lee Stewart is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2017
Location: ABQ, New Mexico
Posts: 36,633
Thanks: 3,506
Thanked 136,542 Times in 22,784 Posts
Default

According to this article, the L70 would make 360 HP!

Quote:
But that doesn't mean none were built. Reader Lynn Dockey directed us to a question about the L-70's existence in Philip Borris's 2012 book, "Echoes of Norwood: General Motors Automobile Production During the Twentieth Century," in which Borris noted that GM initially intended the 360-hp L-70 as a sort of smaller sibling to the L68/L71 tri-power big-block 427s found in the Corvette.
https://www.hemmings.com/stories/202...ne-of-them-all

Was the L70 more than a 350 with trip deuces? Like a higher compression ratio and a solid cam? A 65 HP gain with just a 3x2 induction doesn't add up
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Lee Stewart For This Useful Post:
rlw68 (10-19-2021)
  #5  
Old 10-19-2021, 04:29 PM
1967Z28's Avatar
1967Z28 1967Z28 is offline
Yenko Contributing Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Golden Bear State, USA
Posts: 2,177
Thanks: 2,010
Thanked 1,407 Times in 523 Posts
Default

Phil, for clarification, if the L70 was discontinued prior to the Camaro going into production then it would seem like they would have had to be evaluated on the pilot cars, however those all seem to be well documented as to how they were built. Are you possibly saying the L70 engine was evaluated after it had been discontinued and once regular Camaro production had started?
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 10-19-2021, 05:03 PM
70 copo 70 copo is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: chillicothe Ohio 45601
Posts: 3,834
Thanks: 219
Thanked 1,241 Times in 578 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by 1967Z28 View Post
Phil, for clarification, if the L70 was discontinued prior to the Camaro going into production then it would seem like they would have had to be evaluated on the pilot cars, however those all seem to be well documented as to how they were built. Are you possibly saying the L70 engine was evaluated after it had been discontinued and once regular Camaro production had started?

Yes, kind of. The RPO was drawn and then cancelled per the timeline. However here is where it got interesting when a retiree told me "hey I was part of the L-70 build program".

In summary These were prototypes built in the same side building where the pilots were produced. These were 3X2 small blocks and were cosmetically dressed with the stripes later used on RPO Z/28. The build happened soon after regular Camaro production started in the fall of 1966.

Here is the Air cleaner image close up that I posted in another thread on this topic here back in 2016.
Attached Images
 
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to 70 copo For This Useful Post:
olredalert (10-19-2021)
  #7  
Old 10-19-2021, 07:06 PM
1967Z28's Avatar
1967Z28 1967Z28 is offline
Yenko Contributing Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Golden Bear State, USA
Posts: 2,177
Thanks: 2,010
Thanked 1,407 Times in 523 Posts
Default

Interesting. Thanks for the info.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 08:41 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.

O Garage vBulletin Plugins by Drive Thru Online, Inc.