Dedicated to the Promotion and Preservation of American Muscle Cars, Dealer built Supercars and COPO cars. |
|
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
|
You guys should check out my 66 Camaro. It was a prototype that came out before the 67 model year. It was a collaboration with Chrysler. It was built with a 426 Hemi and Hilborn fuel injection.
__________________
-Dave Semper Fi! 69 Camaro SS396 L34 X66 |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: SgtHawkUSMC</div><div class="ubbcode-body">You guys should check out my 66 Camaro. It was a prototype that came out before the 67 model year. It was a collaboration with Chrysler. It was built with a 426 Hemi and Hilborn fuel injection. </div></div>
HeHeHe [img]<<GRAEMLIN_URL>>/haha.gif[/img]
__________________
You've never lived until you've almost died -- for those who fight for it, life has a flavor the protected will never know! |
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
|
Original GM artwork for 70 Monte Carlo convertible.
__________________
Rick Nelson Musclecar Restoration and Design, Inc (retired) www.musclecarrestorationanddesign.com https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=62r-6vgk2_8 specialized in (only real) LS6 Chevelle restorations |
| The Following User Says Thank You to SS427 For This Useful Post: | ||
PeteLeathersac (07-15-2020) | ||
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
That Monte looks kind of cadillac-ish
|
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Caseys69</div><div class="ubbcode-body">That Monte looks kind of cadillac-ish </div></div>
You're right. The design looked familiar to me but I couldn't place it. I looked at the rear quarters again, then Bingo! The fender skirts and quarter panel front scallops remind me of the 1971-72 Eldorado Convertible. |
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
|
Continuing on the theme, the 4-Door Barracuda silhouette looks almost exactly like that of a 1971 B-Body Sedan, which to my eye is the biggest distraction of the build.
I doubt the Chrysler stylists would have come up with such a clumsy roofline if this concept was ever done for real. Chrysler created some of the most beautiful flowing 4-door hardtop rooflines on their C-body Plymouths, and Chryslers of that era. Designers of that era had a full understanding of how to make a hardtop roofline flow - even on 4-door body styles. GM also built some really good examples of fluidly designed 4-door hardtops that didn't look anything like their 4-door Sedan counterparts. This Barracuda was built around a 1971 4-door Plymouth B-body and unfortunately.... it still looks like a reskined 4-door sedan with shorter deck proportion and Barracuda front and rear design elements. Sadly this 4-Door Barrcuda Project doesn't represent itself well as a "what-if" concept. Its a flop. Sure Chrysler had all type of 4-door Hardtops in their fullsize C-body line in 1970, but General Motors was building the nicest most comprehensive line of 4-door hardtops in the industry (with the obvious exception of pony cars) This photo was found on another Mopar website submitted by ECS. Source: http://www.forbbodiesonly.com/moparf...ept-car/page35 |
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
|
(continued):
If a 1970's General Motors customer wanted to buy any 4-door hardtop model, there's a good chance they were building them. In 1970, the General offered 4-door hardtop models such as: Oldsmobile Cutlass and Ninety-eight, Pontiac Lemans and Catalina, Chevrolet Chevelle, Malibu and Impala, Buick Skylark, LeSabre, Electra, and Wildcat. I may have left some out, but this proves a point. This project can't even be considered a valid "what-if concept" as the builder suggests. A 4-door Barracuda project (based on a sedan or otherwise) would have been cancelled way before it got started....which makes "prototype tribute" such a complete joke. Are we to believe that Chrysler decided it was a good marketing decision to dilute their first year pony image and create an ugly, old-man style, totally useless, 4-door sedan? |
|
#8
|
||||
|
||||
|
Beavis, I may be out of line here (in which case I will apologise) but you started this thread asking opinions about this car, and then continue to put forward your argument for it being nonsense. Sooo.... can I ask outright, are you one of the contributors on that other forum thread that had a long-running 'debate' with ECS?
__________________
Tim in NSW, Australia 1969 Van Nuys 04A Z/28 from Clippinger Chevrolet. Cortez Silver with dark blue interior. Ran at Lions Dragstrip and Pomona Raceway, with paint by Bob Kovacs of Fresno. |
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
|
For someone that has a family to haul around it's a cool car. It's not easy stuffing 6 year old twins, their booster seats and accessories into the rear of a 2 door coupe.
|
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
|
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: robber6910</div><div class="ubbcode-body">For someone that has a family to haul around it's a cool car. It's not easy stuffing 6 year old twins, their booster seats and accessories into the rear of a 2 door coupe. </div></div>
Good point. Sure it has a somewhat bigger rear seat and 2-extra doors so could be <span style="font-style: italic">somewhat</span> useful.... The 4-door trunk looks to be the same size as the two door model. If you've been around Chrysler E-bodies you'll know this tiny trunk and decklid opening won't fit a stroller - or a suitcase! It would barely fit one diaper bag. LOL. My two cents. The "smart money" would've been to consider a sporty model of Chrysler's 1971 Plymouth B-Body Satellite 4-door. It could've used a 340 engine with dual exhaust, rallye wheels, buckets seats and console, maybee a blacked-out grille, subtle stripes, badging, etc if they really wanted to appeal to the young family market as you suggested. It would likely have been shot down, but 90% cheaper than the tooling to build a 4-door Barracuda. |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|