Go Back   The Supercar Registry > General Discussion > Technical & Restoration


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 03-06-2006, 03:40 AM
thehornworks thehornworks is offline
Yenko Contributing Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Wi
Posts: 129
Thanks: 44
Thanked 76 Times in 40 Posts
Default Re: Engine stamping...comments ?

A real dz block.Usually the vin starts 9N 69 norwood Gary
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 03-02-2006, 06:17 PM
Charley Lillard Charley Lillard is offline
Yenko Contributing Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: Woodland, ca. US
Posts: 16,042
Thanks: 527
Thanked 4,963 Times in 1,261 Posts
Default Re: Engine stamping...comments ?

trans
Attached Images
 
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 03-02-2006, 11:57 PM
Lynn Lynn is offline
Yenko Contributing Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Oklahoma
Posts: 7,893
Thanks: 104
Thanked 3,688 Times in 1,553 Posts
Default Re: Engine stamping...comments ?

[ QUOTE ]
trans

[/ QUOTE ]

I would normally assume this engine is in car 124379L626897, correct? Only problem is the last LA built Camaro should have VIN sequence 531163.

My gut feeling is:

Engine and trans stamped by the same "gang held" set of numbers. The first "6" is high in both, and the last "7" looks slightly bigger, but the two stampings definitely look consistent. Could this just have been a new guy (or hungover guy or ___________ [fill in the blank] guy) on the line that just totally screwed up the stamping. I have heard of numbers that were one digit off from the actual car, but nothing this screwed up.

Does the car VIN have any correlation to these stampings?

Charley, is this a test to see what kind of assinine explanations we can come up with?

Lynn
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 03-03-2006, 04:25 AM
Charley Lillard Charley Lillard is offline
Yenko Contributing Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: Woodland, ca. US
Posts: 16,042
Thanks: 527
Thanked 4,963 Times in 1,261 Posts
Default Re: Engine stamping...comments ?

The cars vin is 124379L526897
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 03-02-2006, 06:14 PM
Enoch Enoch is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: USA
Posts: 6,747
Thanks: 260
Thanked 123 Times in 64 Posts
Default Re: Engine stamping...comments ?

There's no plant designation. and the first 6 is should be a 9 it's upside down. The first 8 should be an L because I think by 2-20 of 69 norwood cars had the vin by the oil rail.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 03-02-2006, 07:09 PM
Mr70's Avatar
Mr70 Mr70 is offline
Yenko Contributing Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Illinois
Posts: 20,949
Thanks: 70
Thanked 3,599 Times in 1,450 Posts
Default Re: Engine stamping...comments ?

It also looks like Flint used the number 0 & the letter o,as well as two different type set number 2's.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 03-02-2006, 07:17 PM
Zedder's Avatar
Zedder Zedder is offline
Yenko Contributing Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Ontario, Canada
Posts: 3,330
Thanks: 100
Thanked 642 Times in 354 Posts
Default Re: Engine stamping...comments ?

The deck surface and engine assembly date and code look OK to me. I'm seeing more and more "deep" broach marks in '69 and '70 cars than I usually see in '67 cars...not sure why that would be, but it is definitely very noticeable on many Tonawanda BB's. I can't comment on the VIN derivative as I don't follow '69 Camaros.

I also think that improvements in digital cameras are giving us much more definition than years past and this is raising concerns unnecessarily in some cases.
__________________
Mark
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 03-02-2006, 10:52 PM
TimG TimG is offline
Yenko Contributing Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 4,547
Thanks: 1
Thanked 2,562 Times in 1,002 Posts
Default Re: Engine stamping...comments ?

Here's what I've heard about broach marks. As the broach machine lost its sharpness, the cutting edge or edges were sharpened. When the broach was sharpened, they would surface the hi performance blocks first, this could mean that they would surface the four bolt main blocks first since they were going to have a higher compression.
I don't know if this is true or not, but the broach certainly would wear down leaving different types of broach marks. I've always noticed more of a pattern on big blocks than small blocks.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 10:11 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.

O Garage vBulletin Plugins by Drive Thru Online, Inc.