Go Back   The Supercar Registry > General Discussion > Supercar/Musclecar Discussion


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 08-07-2005, 07:59 AM
Xplantdad's Avatar
Xplantdad Xplantdad is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: AZ
Posts: 32,526
Thanks: 7,741
Thanked 5,867 Times in 2,014 Posts
Default Re: Original motor vs. replacement

Don, Your car is beautiful...
__________________
Bruce
Choose Life-Donate!
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 08-07-2005, 06:45 PM
Alss's Avatar
Alss Alss is offline
Yenko Contributing Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: The tax State of New Jersey
Posts: 2,542
Thanks: 19
Thanked 54 Times in 19 Posts
Default Re: Original motor vs. replacement

Here is my .02 as well. My COPO does not have its original motor and I am almost glad that it doesn't. In todays market with all the " SH%#TY" people restamping motors to "make" a numbers matching car, and with the type of use these cars were intened for, flags always wave when a car states it has the "original numbers matching motor" I feel My CE block is acceptable for these cars as they were raced pretty hard. It helps that I have build sheets, POP imprints, the warranty repair order for the motor and other docs to back the car up. Does it hurt the value?? it may but not a substantial amount..the car is what it is and no one can change that.

ALbert
__________________
1969 9566AA COPO Chevelle M-22
1969 Malibu 489 ZL-1 T-56/4.56
1969 Beaumont 540 th400 3.70
1969 Chevelle 300 Deluxe 427 ZL-1 M 22W
1970 Olds 442 W 30 2 door post
1969 Ply. GTX 426 hemi auto. Blue.
1940 Dodge pick up Durango 4X4
1968 Camaro ragtop LSA ZL1
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 08-07-2005, 06:57 PM
ohhawk ohhawk is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Iowa
Posts: 430
Thanks: 3
Thanked 68 Times in 19 Posts
Default Re: Original motor vs. replacement

I think njsteve and Rick H have summed it up well and the market prices have been reflecting this for quite some time. Kind of a sliding scale down with docs AND matching #'s being the top combination.

Don, did you see Legendary Motor Co. sold their version of your car recently?
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 08-08-2005, 02:39 AM
Don_Lightfoot's Avatar
Don_Lightfoot Don_Lightfoot is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Kingston, Ontario
Posts: 1,193
Thanks: 0
Thanked 3 Times in 2 Posts
Default Re: Original motor vs. replacement

[ QUOTE ]
Don, did you see Legendary Motor Co. sold their version of your car recently?

[/ QUOTE ]
Didn't know that Dick, they had that car for quite a while. Wonder what it went for?????
__________________
Specialized Chevrolet Decals
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 08-08-2005, 04:09 AM
Verne_Frantz Verne_Frantz is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Central New Jersey
Posts: 3,793
Thanks: 34
Thanked 240 Times in 123 Posts
Default Re: Original motor vs. replacement

Craig S.,

The answer to your question is very simple.

Imagine TWO IDENTICAL cars.......one with it's original engine, the other with a replacement. It doesn't matter whether they are '68 Baldwin-Motion Phase III Camaros, Hemi Cuda convertibles, or '49 Nashs. One one with it's original engine will always be worth more.

Of course, there will be cases where due to different equipment or documentation between 2 cars, the one with the replacement engine may be worth more.....but to answer your original question, I think we (you) need to consider IDENTICAL cars in every aspect other than the engine....

Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 08-08-2005, 04:32 AM
Mr70's Avatar
Mr70 Mr70 is offline
Yenko Contributing Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Illinois
Posts: 20,921
Thanks: 70
Thanked 3,540 Times in 1,434 Posts
Default Re: Original motor vs. replacement

You had me,right until you brought up the 49 Nash.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 08-08-2005, 04:40 PM
AutoInsane AutoInsane is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Katy - TX
Posts: 942
Thanks: 41
Thanked 9 Times in 8 Posts
Default Re: Original motor vs. replacement

Good point Verne but that begs the question how much less should a car be worth with the CE block?

I had signed a contract to buy an Orange 70 1/2 Camaro 396/375 from Legendary Motor Cars a few years back. It was represented as numbers matching. (the price was $24,000) I subsequently found out it was a CE block and walked away from the deal. I am still kicking myself buying that car. I was just unsure as to the value with the CE block.

I would think in a more rare and sought after vehicle the numbers matching would matter less. Who here would pass at a Yenko with a CE block and would it really be worth that much less especially in today's market of guys tripping over one another to bid on cars?
__________________
Bill O'Brien

1974 Jeep CJ5 - 304 V8, Edelbrock Intake, Holley 650, MSD Ignition, Patriot Headers
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 08-08-2005, 05:30 PM
Verne_Frantz Verne_Frantz is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Central New Jersey
Posts: 3,793
Thanks: 34
Thanked 240 Times in 123 Posts
Default Re: Original motor vs. replacement

Autoinsane,
How much less? Only the buyer can determine that. An impossible question to answer and apply to all cars.
Certainly, the Yenko with the CE block you mentioned would command a very high price, but again, what if there was an IDENTICAL Yenko next to it but with it's original block?
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 08-08-2005, 05:54 PM
mr396 mr396 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: So. Cal
Posts: 492
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default Re: Original motor vs. replacement

What if you had a 69 yenko with a non original motor, and a 69 camaro, all original 6 cyl with paper work.I would pay more for the yenko.I guess it all depends on the car.If you have paper work on an original car,I think a CE replacement engine would be fine but wouldn't be worth as much as an original,and would be worth more then a car with a non matching engine.I am glad I bought my car 20 years ago.It would be hard to know your getting an original car today, with repoduction protecto plates,window stickers,broadcast sheets, heck even repo 69 camaro convertible bodys.
__________________
Les Dixon 68 camaro SS 396 RS convertible L34/M40/G80/U69
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 08-08-2005, 06:00 PM
Jeff Murphy Jeff Murphy is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: People's Republic of CT
Posts: 1,237
Thanks: 0
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Default Re: Original motor vs. replacement

[ QUOTE ]
It doesn't matter whether they are '68 Baldwin-Motion Phase III Camaros, ...

[/ QUOTE ]

But since the Motion car by definition didn't have it's original engine, as Joel had to take it out to make it a Phase III, how do we think about that? How do you verify the engine Joel put in it? Does it come down to a correctly dated CE engine vs a non-correctly dated CE engine?



My head hurts...
__________________
Jeff M.

ZL1 #49 (Dale, Waukesha WI) Super Stock restoration by SCW; 9561AA (Walters, Hebron OH) Super Stock motor by the Grump
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 03:30 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.

O Garage vBulletin Plugins by Drive Thru Online, Inc.