![]() Dedicated to the Promotion and Preservation of American Muscle Cars, Dealer built Supercars and COPO cars. |
|
Register | Album Gallery | Thread Gallery | FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Become a Paid Member | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I'm going to stick my neck out and say...The green exterior was common, but the green interior is not, especially on an LT1.
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
----Tony,,,I got the same message. Someone got the deal of the year! I never saw the pad....Bill S
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Anyone from the site get it?
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
CTV suffix code wow, a ZR1 vert hiding in plain site. Jeez.
__________________
I ain't nobody, dork. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Here’s the stamp pad of a car built 6 units later. This serial number stamping is what I would consider typical for 1970 production.
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
This from the Green/Green LT-1 seller:
Hi,we did have the car inspected and confirmed it was not a real ZR-1 and we are of the opinion it was re-stamped when it was restored as was the inspector.A very nice Stingray for sure,but it's not a real ZR-1.We had the Stingray inspected by an independent Classic car Appraiser who is very knowledgeable.Beyond the engine stampings,there are other indicators that this Corvette is not a ZR-1.ZR-1's did not have radios or shielding on the ignition wires or an antenna.This car has a radio,and you see where the hole for the antenna mount was filled in and painted over. The M21 transmission,came from a '69 Nova and the rear end date codes are not correct. It's missing some options/features that a ZR-1 would have. It does have the right Block stampings and overall,a very nicely restored Stingray which drives exceptionally well and had the performance of a ZR-1,but without any historical data from Chevrolet to prove otherwise,it's not a ZR-1 in our opinion. The buyer did collect the car,and as far as I know the car is still in our local area. Kind regards, David Bruski |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I was going to say restamp.
While on this topic; I know there are significant differences between a "plain" LT-1 and a ZR1 such as brakes, suspension and mandatory M22. I have never been able to find a definitive answer on what would be different in the engine. There has to some difference to warrant a different engine code. And it can't just be the M22.
__________________
Don't believe everything you read on the internet ... Ben Franklin |
The Following User Says Thank You to Lynn For This Useful Post: | ||
markjohnson (Yesterday) |
#8
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
__________________
1962 Biscayne O-21669 MKIV/M-22 1962 Bel Air Sport Coupe 409/1,000 |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
One difference is the clutch diameter. It's not unusual to see an LT1 assembly code ground and restamped as a ZR1 by changing out the clutch. I looked at a 1972 ZR1 that was prepared this way, no ZR1 engines, grind and restamp the LT1 code and change the clutch.
Last edited by TimG; Today at 12:46 AM. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
So did the ZR1 use a 403 bell housing with 10.5 clutch. I know my LT-1 has 621 bell housing with 11 inch clutch.
Another member suggested it may be no ignition wire shielding because the ZR1 did not offer a radio. Can anyone confirm?
__________________
Don't believe everything you read on the internet ... Ben Franklin |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|