Go Back   The Supercar Registry > Classified Section > Supercars/Musclecars-Wanted

Please note


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 08-08-2025, 02:13 AM
Lynn Lynn is offline
Yenko Contributing Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Oklahoma
Posts: 7,844
Thanks: 96
Thanked 3,623 Times in 1,529 Posts
Default

I think he has since posted the rest of the report.
__________________
Don't believe everything you read on the internet ... Ben Franklin
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 08-08-2025, 02:24 AM
enio45 enio45 is offline
Yenko Contributing Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Gilbert, AZ
Posts: 4,165
Thanks: 453
Thanked 381 Times in 225 Posts
Default

cannot beat Lemans Blue!
__________________
Eddie M

Camaro-less
87 El Camino SS
Few Ferrari's
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 08-08-2025, 02:32 AM
Lynn Lynn is offline
Yenko Contributing Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Oklahoma
Posts: 7,844
Thanks: 96
Thanked 3,623 Times in 1,529 Posts
Default

Block Stamp. Rebuild pics.
Attached Images
  
__________________
Don't believe everything you read on the internet ... Ben Franklin
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 08-08-2025, 02:40 AM
Jonesy's Avatar
Jonesy Jonesy is offline
Yenko Contributing Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Duluth, Minnesota
Posts: 3,149
Thanks: 339
Thanked 806 Times in 504 Posts
Default

Stamping looks good, but I wonder why no current pic or pic of the rear axle tube stamping. Just helps the sale. I dont trust anything anymore these days.
__________________
1969 Camaro RS/SS Azure Turquoise
1969 Camaro Z/28 Azure Turquoise
1984 Camaro z/28 L69 HO 5 speed
1984 Camaro z/28 zz4 conversion
1987 Monte Carlo SS original owner
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 08-08-2025, 03:16 AM
Jonesy's Avatar
Jonesy Jonesy is offline
Yenko Contributing Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Duluth, Minnesota
Posts: 3,149
Thanks: 339
Thanked 806 Times in 504 Posts
Default

That 2nd and 3rd page of McNeish report sums up some suspicions.

Things that I see that raise questions
NCRS says car was built 4-1-69, but rear is dated 3-31?
POP - is it a repop? McNeish questions it. Says dealer stamp is not legit
In the handwritten notes pic 330 - Aug 3, 2003 - new shortblock rebuilt? So is the really the born with engine?
That dealer invoice looks too fresh and made up, MacNeish questions it also.

Was POP made up to match the current drive line? I like the Trans stamp. Engine pad stamp but not sure about the VIN stamp on the engine. I question the 3/31 rear (no stamping pic) in a 4/1 built car.

Kurt S is the expert on POPs

If the POP is in question by McNeish, then you got to wonder. The other docs are suspect.
__________________
1969 Camaro RS/SS Azure Turquoise
1969 Camaro Z/28 Azure Turquoise
1984 Camaro z/28 L69 HO 5 speed
1984 Camaro z/28 zz4 conversion
1987 Monte Carlo SS original owner
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 08-08-2025, 11:02 AM
dykstra's Avatar
dykstra dykstra is offline
Yenko Contributing Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Washington, IL
Posts: 2,692
Thanks: 30,493
Thanked 2,722 Times in 1,291 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jonesy View Post
That 2nd and 3rd page of McNeish report sums up some suspicions.

Things that I see that raise questions
NCRS says car was built 4-1-69, but rear is dated 3-31?
POP - is it a repop? McNeish questions it. Says dealer stamp is not legit
In the handwritten notes pic 330 - Aug 3, 2003 - new shortblock rebuilt? So is the really the born with engine?
That dealer invoice looks too fresh and made up, MacNeish questions it also.

Was POP made up to match the current drive line? I like the Trans stamp. Engine pad stamp but not sure about the VIN stamp on the engine. I question the 3/31 rear (no stamping pic) in a 4/1 built car.

Kurt S is the expert on POPs


If the POP is in question by McNeish, then you got to wonder. The other docs are suspect.

So because the rear was built on 3/31, does that mean the rear was built too late for a 4/1 built car?
In other words, should the rear have been already built weeks before 4/1?
__________________
Dave Dykstra
1968 Camaro Palomino Ivory/Ivy Gold interior
-Delivered to Courtesy Chevrolet, Los Angeles, CA
2013 Corvette Grand Sport 60th Anniversary Edition
Arctic White/Diamond Blue interior
-Delivered to Bill Jacobs Chevrolet, Joliet, IL
NCRS#66003

Speed has never killed anyone. Suddenly becoming stationary, that’s what gets
you. – Jeremy Clarkson.



Dykstra Motorsports
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 08-08-2025, 03:51 AM
Lynn Lynn is offline
Yenko Contributing Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Oklahoma
Posts: 7,844
Thanks: 96
Thanked 3,623 Times in 1,529 Posts
Default

Agree docs are suspect. I just always assume POPs are repops unless there is some reason to believe they are not. My first Z came with a POP in the glove box. I tossed it, because in my mind "it was no use to me." Most were tossed once out of warranty.
Jerry stated the engine is "original to vehicle."
Not saying he couldn't be wrong. He has been fooled before.
__________________
Don't believe everything you read on the internet ... Ben Franklin
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 08-08-2025, 02:26 PM
Billohio Billohio is offline
Yenko Contributing Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Ohio
Posts: 1,655
Thanks: 926
Thanked 345 Times in 228 Posts
Default

Jonesy what do you think of the engine vin and transmission vin being different fonts? I thought they were stamped at the same time. Jerry seemed to approve it.
__________________
Bill
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 08-09-2025, 02:15 AM
Billohio Billohio is offline
Yenko Contributing Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Ohio
Posts: 1,655
Thanks: 926
Thanked 345 Times in 228 Posts
Default

My burgundy Z has a production date of 03/26/69. Axle is dated 03/25/69 Tag is 03D
__________________
Bill
Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Billohio For This Useful Post:
69M22Z (08-09-2025), dykstra (08-11-2025), enio45 (08-09-2025)
  #10  
Old 08-21-2025, 01:33 PM
napa68's Avatar
napa68 napa68 is offline
SCR Sponsor
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Presque Isle, WI
Posts: 3,812
Thanks: 5,800
Thanked 5,106 Times in 1,285 Posts
Default

This might be a rock worth kicking over......

https://www.hemmings.com/classifieds...26729210997c0d
Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to napa68 For This Useful Post:
169indy (08-21-2025), dykstra (08-22-2025)
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 05:35 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.

O Garage vBulletin Plugins by Drive Thru Online, Inc.