Go Back   The Supercar Registry > General Discussion > Supercar/Musclecar Discussion


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 10-18-2021, 02:33 PM
ELEFUNTMAN ELEFUNTMAN is offline
Yenko Contributing Member
 
Join Date: May 2017
Location: SoCal
Posts: 102
Thanks: 9
Thanked 45 Times in 25 Posts
Default

Nice rocker arms and headers too!!
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 10-18-2021, 04:32 PM
William William is offline
Yenko Contributing Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: New Berlin WI USA
Posts: 2,659
Thanks: 254
Thanked 2,916 Times in 812 Posts
Default

"Under consideration" is meaningless.

Some excellent books that cover the real story on Chevrolets' involvement in racing in the '60s:

Chevrolet = Racing?
By Paul Van Valkenburgh

He worked in Chevrolet R & D in the ‘60s. Chevy had tremendous involvement with stock car racing, T/A racing with Penske/Donohue, sports car racing with Jim Hall/Chaparral. He mentions the real story behind the JL8 option. In the "under consideration" category, the Tech Center built a Z/28 with a Corvette rear axle assembly. Surprise, didn't corner any better than the live axle.

The Unfair Advantage
By Mark Donohue

There is no better source for perspective on what dealing with Chevrolet was like. The Penske/Chevrolet relationship was so bad by the end of ’69 they switched to AMC Javelins for the 1970 season. When their ’67 Camaro race car was damaged in a trailer wreck it was rebuilt with junkyard parts.

Best Damn Garage in Town
By Smokey Yunick

The consummate insider, Smokey was there at the birth of NASCAR and was involved with R & D well into the ‘70s. There are some amusing comments about the Hemi 302. A constant theme throughout the book is how cheap and difficult Chevy was to deal with.

I also have the FIA Homologation documents for the '67, '68 and '69 Z/28s.

Nowhere in any of these publications is the sb 3 x 2 manifold mentioned. And why would it be? Looks to have been cancelled April, 1966, months prior to the introduction of the Camaro. As for Smokey Yunick, he was not partnered with the factory in SCCA T/A racing. The SCCA didn't much want him around either, finding many rule infractions in the Camaros he built. That he had this 3 x 2 intake doesn't mean much either. He had buildings full of factory parts that were never used. Chevrolet may have asked him to evaluate it. Since it was never released for production, safe to say he wasn't impressed.

Sorry for the rant, attempts to re-write history need to be addressed.
__________________
Learning more and more about less and less...
Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to William For This Useful Post:
markjohnson (10-18-2021), x44d80 (10-18-2021), X66 714 (10-18-2021)
  #3  
Old 10-18-2021, 04:51 PM
70 copo 70 copo is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: chillicothe Ohio 45601
Posts: 3,834
Thanks: 219
Thanked 1,241 Times in 578 Posts
Default

William,

Do you have a copy of Echoes of Norwood?

Multiple eye witnesses from the Assembly line have gone on the record as stating several examples were built for GM. Cars produced had Z/28 style stripes.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 10-18-2021, 11:38 PM
70 copo 70 copo is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: chillicothe Ohio 45601
Posts: 3,834
Thanks: 219
Thanked 1,241 Times in 578 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by 70 copo View Post
William,

Do you have a copy of Echoes of Norwood?

Multiple eye witnesses from the Assembly line have gone on the record as stating several examples were built for GM. Cars produced had Z/28 style stripes.
Quote:
Originally Posted by William View Post
So what? Many things were considered for production.
I am not sure if you understand? I asked you If you had a copy?

The L-70 was produced at Norwood according to workers who were eyewitnesses, and this story along with images of the engine are in the book.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 10-18-2021, 11:46 PM
scuncio's Avatar
scuncio scuncio is offline
Yenko Contributing Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Michigan
Posts: 14,179
Thanks: 2,941
Thanked 7,412 Times in 3,344 Posts
Default

Are there images of the engine in the Norwood plant?

Perhaps this was a pilot build prior to cancelation.
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to scuncio For This Useful Post:
Tom Hartman (10-24-2021)
  #6  
Old 10-19-2021, 12:38 PM
70 copo 70 copo is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: chillicothe Ohio 45601
Posts: 3,834
Thanks: 219
Thanked 1,241 Times in 578 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by scuncio View Post
Are there images of the engine in the Norwood plant?

Perhaps this was a pilot build prior to cancelation.

Yes this is correct. The L-70 was produced in plant as a prototype job for GM evaluation.

Images of this engine with the air cleaner on and off are in the book that was first published back in 2013.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 10-19-2021, 01:25 AM
William William is offline
Yenko Contributing Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: New Berlin WI USA
Posts: 2,659
Thanks: 254
Thanked 2,916 Times in 812 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by 70 copo View Post
I am not sure if you understand? I asked you If you had a copy?

The L-70 was produced at Norwood according to workers who were eyewitnesses, and this story along with images of the engine are in the book.
Nope, do not have a copy.

Not getting your point. Since the manifold has a production part number and the Engine Dress Line components are shown in the AIM, it did come close. I don't doubt L70 Pilots were built. The M08 Sport Shift option is in the '69 AIM with part numbers and that never made production either. It happens.

My position is that the L70 was intended as an option for the SS350. There is no reason to believe there was any intention to use it on the 302. For whatever reason, it never became a production engine.
__________________
Learning more and more about less and less...
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to William For This Useful Post:
Lee Stewart (10-19-2021)
  #8  
Old 10-19-2021, 12:34 PM
70 copo 70 copo is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: chillicothe Ohio 45601
Posts: 3,834
Thanks: 219
Thanked 1,241 Times in 578 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by William View Post
Nope, do not have a copy.

Not getting your point. Since the manifold has a production part number and the Engine Dress Line components are shown in the AIM, it did come close. I don't doubt L70 Pilots were built. The M08 Sport Shift option is in the '69 AIM with part numbers and that never made production either. It happens.

My position is that the L70 was intended as an option for the SS350. There is no reason to believe there was any intention to use it on the 302. For whatever reason, it never became a production engine.

I understand then that you have an opinion then. That's fine with me.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 10-18-2021, 04:56 PM
William William is offline
Yenko Contributing Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: New Berlin WI USA
Posts: 2,659
Thanks: 254
Thanked 2,916 Times in 812 Posts
Default

So what? Many things were considered for production.
__________________
Learning more and more about less and less...
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 10-18-2021, 05:32 PM
Fast67VelleN2O's Avatar
Fast67VelleN2O Fast67VelleN2O is offline
Yenko Contributing Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Mullica Hill, NJ
Posts: 4,106
Thanks: 7
Thanked 186 Times in 93 Posts
Default

Very interesting that this manifold has an actual production part number and is not an 0- part, especially being dated February of 1966.
__________________
Day 2 is Life.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 11:35 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.

O Garage vBulletin Plugins by Drive Thru Online, Inc.