![]() Dedicated to the Promotion and Preservation of American Muscle Cars, Dealer built Supercars and COPO cars. |
|
Register | Album Gallery | Thread Gallery | FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Become a Paid Member | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Thank you for being "All In " ! Without the hard work and the work of others,parts of history would be lost forever, Timing is everything and without a sieze the moment attitude and this current whirlwind tour, I'm sure this would have never happened. Honestly, with or without the car, I'm glad someone is picking the brains of those that were there...Thanks!
BIG |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Play nice everyone.
__________________
...... |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
My post was not meant to bring the CRG into the discussion.
"Would the result have been the same if I started to name all the forums where the car was bashed where the research was bashed where credibility was attacked?" You mentioned in your post above, the car/research/credibility being bashed/attacked in other forums and in my opinion, it was not. Just my opinion here from what I observed. I would hope GM does not see it that way and I'm not sure why they would. The discussion pertaining <span style="text-decoration: underline">specifically</span> to questions about the #1 Pilot Camaro has resulted in new and helpful information being posted to the website. And we cleared up that part about the production figures/book a few months ago. It was the way it was worded that made it a little confusing. As you mentioned, "we were both correct kind of..." I'm good on that front.
__________________
381 and counting in the 67-69 Impala SS427 registry |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|