Go Back   The Supercar Registry > General Discussion > Technical & Restoration


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 02-15-2006, 04:24 AM
Belair62 Belair62 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Suburban Chicago
Posts: 13,448
Thanks: 0
Thanked 14 Times in 11 Posts
Default Re: 1963 chevy small block

Verne..John P did not disappear by any means...he is not a bullshitter either so I would love to hear the rest of this story too...
__________________
<span style="font-weight: bold"> (__{B}_____]]]]~~~~</span>
Don't mess with old farts - age and treachery will always overcome youth and skill! Bullshit and brilliance only come with age and experience.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 02-15-2006, 06:32 AM
Verne_Frantz Verne_Frantz is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Central New Jersey
Posts: 3,793
Thanks: 34
Thanked 240 Times in 123 Posts
Default Re: 1963 chevy small block

FINE, I'm just TIRED of this BS
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 02-15-2006, 06:45 AM
Belair62 Belair62 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Suburban Chicago
Posts: 13,448
Thanks: 0
Thanked 14 Times in 11 Posts
Default Re: 1963 chevy small block

now chill out buddy...actually I bet its not the casting number but maybe a rebuilder punched that on the pad
__________________
<span style="font-weight: bold"> (__{B}_____]]]]~~~~</span>
Don't mess with old farts - age and treachery will always overcome youth and skill! Bullshit and brilliance only come with age and experience.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 02-15-2006, 06:52 AM
ssl78 ssl78 is offline
Yenko Contributing Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: West Chicago Il
Posts: 2,131
Thanks: 1
Thanked 238 Times in 107 Posts
Default Re: 1963 chevy small block

I was in Florida for a couple of weeks just came back yesterday. I have to arrange to go see the engine since its about 800 miles away. When I find something out I will post it.
__________________
69 RS SS L78 conv
69 RS SS ZL1
69 L78 Chevelle conv
69 L78 Nova
69 L34 Nova
67 SS Chevelle
73 Trans Am
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 02-15-2006, 06:04 PM
Verne_Frantz Verne_Frantz is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Central New Jersey
Posts: 3,793
Thanks: 34
Thanked 240 Times in 123 Posts
Default Re: 1963 chevy small block

I apologize. I haven't been feeling very well lately and my patience factor is at zero.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 02-15-2006, 06:24 PM
Xplantdad's Avatar
Xplantdad Xplantdad is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: AZ
Posts: 32,511
Thanks: 7,663
Thanked 5,826 Times in 2,002 Posts
Default Re: 1963 chevy small block

Hey Verne,

John is the nicest person that you can meet...I also think you are the same type of guy. I enjoy reading all the information that you post about early 348-409 Chevy stuff.

I hope that you start to fell better soon!

Take it easy, my man!
__________________
Bruce
Choose Life-Donate!
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 02-16-2006, 01:00 AM
PeteLeathersac's Avatar
PeteLeathersac PeteLeathersac is online now
Yenko Contributing Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: O' Canada
Posts: 12,388
Thanks: 18,619
Thanked 5,657 Times in 2,411 Posts
Default Re: 1963 chevy small block

John, looking forward to whatever you come up with. . I take it the info you have is second hand at best so where did the 1963 and 327 parts come from? . Something rings about this Super thing....is it possibile it's an aluminum block? . Remember the G-S w/ an alum. 327 also the Xp rear engine car had one plus the ones offered to racers etc.
~ Pete

And Vern, the martians took the Chevy stuff as they know a Chevy engine conversion on the saucer is the only way to fly....especially with a fuel crystal! .
I always like to bug my Ford pals that Zora jumped ship from the darkside....after all the fun w/ the ArDun flatty motors, once he went Chevy he was hooked too! . Actually, didn't he dislike the W motors? ~ Pete
__________________
I like real cars best...especially the REAL real ones!
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 02-16-2006, 02:36 AM
Verne_Frantz Verne_Frantz is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Central New Jersey
Posts: 3,793
Thanks: 34
Thanked 240 Times in 123 Posts
Default Re: 1963 chevy small block

Pete,
I've been, let's say, under a dark cloud for awhile myself recently, and it's unfortunately had a negative effect on me.
I've heard, or read somewhere that Zora tried to put a 409 in a '63 Vette, but for whatever reasons, it didn't fly. I've also heard, from a VERY unreliable source who claims to have worked with him, that he tried an aluminum block version.
What I DO know is that a 409 will fit perfectly in a '63 Vette, stock exhaust manifolds and all, including hood clearance. What a ride that never was!
Obviously, I was being tongue n' check when I mentioned that block I have.
I've been going through some trials lately. Still not out of the woods. I'm sorry if I came off like a jerk. And I apologize to John.

And don't forget the flux capacitor
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 02-16-2006, 08:13 AM
Verne_Frantz Verne_Frantz is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Central New Jersey
Posts: 3,793
Thanks: 34
Thanked 240 Times in 123 Posts
Default Re: 1963 chevy small block

Pete,
I don't know if Zora actually disliked the W engine or not. I hope there are more people out there who might offer more incite than I, but I do know that he was in charge of their development and was the man behind the scenes working to make the 348 a Nascar winner from '58-'60, working closely with Jim Rathman and Rex White through SEDCO to be close to Daytona.
Here are a few quotes from Zora himself:
"In '58 I start to work with Buck Baker. In '59 two things happan: opening of speedway in Daytona, and two preliminary races, two heat, 125miles each. Both races, three Chevrolet 1-2-3 and second race also 1-2-3........Then I decided engine was good enough to go, 348 cubic inches, not supposed to be racing, right?...........Jim Rathman ran 348 cubic displacement engines, part of my development. It became my development, and Dick Keinath came to my group and was instrumental in 348 and 409 and 427, but not MK II. That was just Dick. The 427 exist only for drag racing, the Z-11. Identical block like 409, but 427 cubic inches."
"Cole and Barr (Harry Barr, chief engineer) came up with idea - to establish Marine Division. Marine Division was, at that time, subterfuge. Marine Division was organized under me and provide means and engineering budget to funnel money, material and work for the racers........348 Marine engine. I was director of high performance including Marine engine. But I will tell you, in 1960 eighty percent of the starters at Daytona were Chevrolets. And one failure was one car that pick up debris and burst crankcase. Mechanically, all cars were scot-free. That proved the 348, started out as a truck engine, was a very good racing engine also."

Those are all the comments I could find regarding Zora and the W engine. I'll have to disagree with Zora's last statement about the W starting out as a truck angine. I have the original 5 design objectives for the new engine (and I wrote an article about it back in '88). The objectives clearly stated both passenger car and truck applications from the git-go, with the ability to adapt to high performance equipment.
Did Zora dislike the W? I still don't know the answer to that.

Verne
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 11:15 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.

O Garage vBulletin Plugins by Drive Thru Online, Inc.