Dedicated to the Promotion and Preservation of American Muscle Cars, Dealer built Supercars and COPO cars. |
|
|||||||
| Register | Album Gallery | Thread Gallery | FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Become a Paid Member | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
I think some of you hit the nail on the head! A musclecar is one with an oversized engine. I believe that Corvettes can be considered a musclecar when equipped with the optional high performance power plant. Musclevettes would be '65 L78 396/425hp cars, then '66 L72 427/425hp cars, then '67 L71 427/435hp cars, then L88 427/430hp cars, then L89 427/435hp cars, then LS-6 454/425hp cars. With these engines the Corvette is not a well balanced sports car.
__________________
2 1971 LS-6 Corvette coupes (Duntov's last stand) |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
This is a regular topic in the Stock Appearing & Pure Stock circles, and the best clarification I've heard is from Big Squeeze:
"A square is a rectangle, but a rectangle isn't necessarily a square..........A sportscar is a Musclecar, but a Musclecar isn't necessarily a sportscar.........." |
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
If the car has the Horse Power, It's a MusclCAR. :Corvettes/ 63 327 F.I.. 1966 450 hp ,69 350/350 , 71 w/Mod LT1 475hp, All of which I owned, W/ my wife & son along, They were not on board while racing, Bring on the yenkos & Mopars,Vettes Forever! Thanks 71 can am
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|