Dedicated to the Promotion and Preservation of American Muscle Cars, Dealer built Supercars and COPO cars. |
|
|||||||
| Register | Album Gallery | Thread Gallery | FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Become a Paid Member | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
03-11-2004, 06:27 AM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: A true Mach1 or a fast back Stang?
Hi!
In 1969 the Mach1 is identifiable by the door tag if you seen: Body:63C and color code need two digit ex: C5 Ray 
|
|
#2
03-11-2004, 06:31 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: A true Mach1 or a fast back Stang?
Thanks for joining up and chiming in Ray...
__________________
 <span style="font-weight: bold"> (__{B}_____]]]]~~~~</span>Don't mess with old farts - age and treachery will always overcome youth and skill! Bullshit and brilliance only come with age and experience.
|
|
#3
03-11-2004, 06:44 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: A true Mach1 or a fast back Stang?
Hmmm.. I'm obviously looking at a 69 that is advertised as a Mach 1. It sure looks like a Mach 1 and all the stickers are correct, but I just wanted to be sure...
The VIN # is 9t02m196707. The car is in very good shape and wouldnt take much to make it exactly how I'd want it... Its asking price is $13k.... Thats about $1000 more than I could get that 71 Z28 for, but I kinda like the Mach 1's better. We dont see as many of them around here.. What one do you all think is or was faster (stock)? a 71 Z28 (auto) or a 69 Mach 1 w/351 4V and a 4spd? Ive never witnessed a 351 Mach 1 in action....
|
|
#4
03-11-2004, 07:15 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: A true Mach1 or a fast back Stang?
I think the '71 Z is faster.
I was thinking 1970 when it came to the rarity of coupes - my bad! They made 70 in 1970. Stats can be seen here. Grandes are especially rare.
|
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Hybrid Mode
