1969 Camaro double COPO (ebay)

[Jeff H]

That is obviously not the original rear for that car and I think he said that in the description. It still looks like a restamp, but that could be because they smoothed out the surface and had to restamp it. My point about the dates is that so many people think the drivetrain components should be with a month of the build date and I've seen quite a few hi-po cars where 1 of the 3 components was 3-4 months prior to the others. For every rule, there's an exception.

[Kurt S]

Most of the COPO engines are much closer than that one.
But from the VIN and body #, it confirms to be a COPO.
Interesting that it's a COPO from Grand Rapids, but not from Berger.

Kurt