![]() Dedicated to the Promotion and Preservation of American Muscle Cars, Dealer built Supercars and COPO cars. |
|
Register | Album Gallery | Thread Gallery | FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Become a Paid Member | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
The ad from the 2012 Barrett Jackson auction does indeed list it as a #'s matching car Bill.
|
The Following User Says Thank You to carnut4life For This Useful Post: | ||
scuncio (06-17-2022) |
#2
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
In this day and age "matching numbers" doesn't necessarily mean "born with". A restamped block in a 'vette, doesn't seem to be a big issue to many and on a legal point, the current block in the car does have "matching numbers"...
![]()
__________________
Mitch 1970 Chevelle SS 1966 Chevelle SS 1967 Camaro ss/rs 1938 Business coupe, street rod 2000 FXSTS, original owner, 13k miles |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I'd sure want the original "born with" block if it was my car, but like you said Mitch a lot of people are happy with #'s matching. It's a shame what that phrase has been reduced to over the years IMO.
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I hear ya and I'm with ya. The "investment grade" resellers of 20-25 yrs ago twisted the terms we had used for some time to suit their own needs and this is where we are today. Lots of loopholes when it comes to "original" now...
![]()
__________________
Mitch 1970 Chevelle SS 1966 Chevelle SS 1967 Camaro ss/rs 1938 Business coupe, street rod 2000 FXSTS, original owner, 13k miles |