Outrageous Claim or Legit Car?

[69 Post Sedan]

Yeah.....

[YENKO DEUCE REGISTRY]

Originally Posted by 69 Post Sedan

Yeah.....

Thanks for posting!!

So, for the record (!!) I never bashed Patrick's find, it's a great car - I simply don't believe it is what he claims it to be, nothing more than that.

Also, Patrick is claiming that I agree with him...', not at all!! He is trying to prove that there is some type of reversal of opinion on how the 37 were formed, and my comment in the last image above states 'prevailing opinion...' because people simple don't know if / how Yenko supplied the cars. I've been very clear that Patrick's Nova is indeed quite similar to cars included in the 37 based on color, trim, build date - except for the automatic, that's a deal breaker. So, to allude that there is some type of conspiracy here is absolutely ludicrous.

Again, its a great car, but it would behoove Patrick to ask questions instead of digging up a 12 year old thread, it smacks of desperation..... there is no 'smoking gun' in those comments, and for goodness sake don't state that there is 'DEFINITELY' some effort to lower the value of the car.

[Craig_Maiorana]

My question is Why does he take his "findings" to facebook and remain quiet here?

The car is an automatic so we know that excludes it from being one of the "For conversion cars"

[69 Post Sedan]

Originally Posted by Craig_Maiorana

My question is Why does he take his "findings" to facebook and remain quiet here?

The car is an automatic so we know that excludes it from being one of the "For conversion cars"

From the little I’ve seen, he doesn’t like to hear statements that oppose his views. I’ll leave it at that.......

[69hurstSC]

Originally Posted by 69 Post Sedan

From the little I’ve seen, he doesn’t like to hear statements that oppose his views. I’ll leave it at that.......

That and he doesn't want a paper trail of opposing views from Yenko experts and historians associated with this car.

Maybe Marlin could shed more light. Looking at the VIN, its not even remotely close to any of the 26 confirmed cars.

[YENKO DEUCE REGISTRY]

Originally Posted by 69hurstSC

That and he doesn't want a paper trail of opposing views from Yenko experts and historians associated with this car.

Maybe Marlin could shed more light. Looking at the VIN, its not even remotely close to any of the 26 confirmed cars.

Sure, so if this car were to be inserted into the short list of '69 Yenko Novas where we know the build week, it would look like this image. Note how the build week is not precisely in line with the known cars, but its within the range of this small sample. Same for the VIN and BODY number. Also note (for the number geeks!!!) that the body number is lower than any of them - even the 01A cars. We see this frequently, although perhaps not with this big of a difference, primarily because the date on the tag is the 'scheduled' build date and not always the 'actual' build date. Keep in mind that its the only automatic, which has slight body changes versus a manual trans....

[Fast67VelleN2O]

Originally Posted by YENKO DEUCE REGISTRY

Sure, so if this car were to be inserted into the short list of '69 Yenko Novas where we know the build week, it would look like this image. Note how the build week is not precisely in line with the known cars, but its within the range of this small sample. Same for the VIN and BODY number. Also note (for the number geeks!!!) that the body number is lower than any of them - even the 01A cars. We see this frequently, although perhaps not with this big of a difference, primarily because the date on the tag is the 'scheduled' build date and not always the 'actual' build date. Keep in mind that its the only automatic, which has slight body changes versus a manual trans....

Now he's going to use that image as proof that it was "in the registry" and it was doctored to exclude it because this is a huge conspiracy against him. LOLOLOLOLOL