Go Back   The Supercar Registry > General Discussion > Chevrolet


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 04-27-2017, 03:35 PM
cook_dw's Avatar
cook_dw cook_dw is offline
Yenko Contributing Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 4,394
Thanks: 674
Thanked 1,739 Times in 663 Posts
Default

Congrats on the sale and the buyer.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 10-02-2017, 05:47 PM
Fast67VelleN2O's Avatar
Fast67VelleN2O Fast67VelleN2O is offline
Yenko Contributing Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Mullica Hill, NJ
Posts: 4,114
Thanks: 7
Thanked 188 Times in 94 Posts
Default

Just to recap.. the negative comments about my BE rear in this thread lost me my sale, so thanks to that for the people who have no clue when it comes to rare parts like this. It was just recently brought to my attention by another member here that I have the same exact rear as another COPO currently listed for sale. Just a heads up to all the naysayers... here is a DOCUMENTED COPO that has the same exact rear end date code and assembly stamping.

https://www.yenko.net/forum/showthread.php?t=144521


__________________
Day 2 is Life.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 10-04-2017, 01:23 PM
HawkX66's Avatar
HawkX66 HawkX66 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2015
Location: VA/MA
Posts: 1,021
Thanks: 1,015
Thanked 225 Times in 134 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Fast67VelleN2O View Post
Just to recap.. the negative comments about my BE rear in this thread lost me my sale, so thanks to that for the people who have no clue when it comes to rare parts like this. It was just recently brought to my attention by another member here that I have the same exact rear as another COPO currently listed for sale. Just a heads up to all the naysayers... here is a DOCUMENTED COPO that has the same exact rear end date code and assembly stamping.
If my comments attributed to your loss of sale, I truly apologize. I just read back through the thread and only see a reasonable discussion though questioning something that didn't look right. Uneducated on the specific subject as the opinions might have been, I stated that it was just my opinion based on what I was seeing in the pic. I'm sure my words aren't going to fix anything, but I do apologize if I screwed something up for you.
__________________
-Dave
Semper Fi!

69 Camaro SS396 L34 X66
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 10-04-2017, 03:08 PM
camaromb camaromb is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Bensenville, Il USA
Posts: 983
Thanks: 3
Thanked 9 Times in 8 Posts
Default

416 is a know BE date, that should have never been an issue. My Canadian Copo had a 416 dated BE and there are other Copo cars with that date.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 10-04-2017, 08:50 PM
m22mike's Avatar
m22mike m22mike is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: West of CAK
Posts: 5,001
Thanks: 766
Thanked 841 Times in 407 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by camaromb View Post
416 is a know BE date, that should have never been an issue. My Canadian Copo had a 416 dated BE and there are other Copo cars with that date.
And because the E is stamped off center it is assumed a BL, NOT !
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 09:17 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.

O Garage vBulletin Plugins by Drive Thru Online, Inc.