Dedicated to the Promotion and Preservation of American Muscle Cars, Dealer built Supercars and COPO cars. |
|
|||||||
| Register | Album Gallery | Thread Gallery | FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Become a Paid Member | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
Jonesy has many more examples for comparison than I do. Like everyone else, I would like to see better pics.
__________________
Don't believe everything you read on the internet ... Ben Franklin |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
|
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
I know we've seen the very early (Oct-Nov '68) '69 LA built Camaros with the vin by the oil filter. By '69 the vins appeared on the front pad, but like Norwood, LA seemed to use both the pad and oil filter area from late '68 through early '69. My 01B built LA Z is stamped by the oil filter and my 03B built LA Z is stamped on the pad. I have not seen an LA built Z with a pad stamped vin with a body date later than March. '69, thats why I'm asking. Does anyone have any examples of an LA built Camaro with a pad stamped vin later than March. '69?
|
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
|
Yes, the stamping is original and correct for that period with the VIN on the pad. Spacing is correct as well. The latest LA pad with Vin on the pad which I have is 418DZ in a 5A built car.
__________________
Steve Shauger The Supercar Registry www.yenko.net or www.thesupercarregistry.com Vintage Certification™ , Providing Recognition to Unrestored Muscle Cars. Website: www.vintagecertification.com |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|