Dedicated to the Promotion and Preservation of American Muscle Cars, Dealer built Supercars and COPO cars. |
|
|||||||
| Register | Album Gallery | Thread Gallery | FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Become a Paid Member | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
|
The AD pic is sales "art" and nothing more, this is from the first printing. I wouldn't base too much on that picture.
BIG |
| The Following User Says Thank You to 68l30 For This Useful Post: | ||
steel (12-18-2017) | ||
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: 68l30</div><div class="ubbcode-body">The AD pic is sales "art" and nothing more, this is from the first printing. I wouldn't base too much on that picture.
BIG </div></div> Have you ever seen a print ad that showed gloss? I haven't is why I ask. Why would Chevrolet consistently advertise something that was so far off year after year? I think if Chevy thought the print ad being satin would sell more Camaros then it stands to reason that the actual car being satin would sell more as well right? Either way, gloss looks hideous in my opinion and nobody has proven to me that it really was gloss. I know there are a lot of 46 yo survivors with original paint out there, but a lot can happen in 46 years.
__________________
-Dave Semper Fi! 69 Camaro SS396 L34 X66 |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|