1965 impala SS 409

[x Baldwin Motion]

Only the early 65's had the 409 as the 396 replaced before midyear. Not sure what part of that story was supposed to be interesting but I disagree with the statement about these cars NOT being popular in the early 80's. Got mine in 78 and it was all the rage. [img]<<GRAEMLIN_URL>>/headbang.gif[/img]

[Keith Seymore]

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: x Baldwin Motion</div><div class="ubbcode-body">Only the early 65's had the 409 as the 396 replaced before midyear. Not sure what part of that story was supposed to be interesting but I disagree with the statement about these cars NOT being popular in the early 80's. Got mine in 78 and it was all the rage. [img]<<GRAEMLIN_URL>>/headbang.gif[/img] </div></div>

Yes - a lot of speculation in that ebay ad -

K

[BARRY]

a buddy of mine had a 1965 409 low hp car loaded even had power vent windows blue on blue hard top he passed away the wife solded the car i not seen this car in 10 years

[olredalert]

----The serial # might help if he had included it, and the fuel line is probably longer toward the front of the car if the line is similar to former years. Radiator would be different, now that i think about it. Also, check the front fender callout holes as to weather they are stamped or drilled for the 409, and, of course, the rear-end. All I can think of at the moment.....Bill S