Dedicated to the Promotion and Preservation of American Muscle Cars, Dealer built Supercars and COPO cars. |
|
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
|
It does get confusing because sometimes people refer to "Day 2 parts" on a car and the parts are several years newer. I think the term gets used pretty loosely around here when talking about vintage speed equipment in general. Day 2 is a style of build simply using old non-original parts on a car built with the means and methods of what was popular when the car was new.
I'm with Rick that you have to draw a line on when the old parts become too "modern" or were not available around the time the car was new. I personally feel the line should be drawn a the 2 year mark. So that is my criteria, but if you used it around here- you would still be confused as it clearly has a different meaning to others. |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
So its pretty much referring to a modified car that now has been customized using some era correct performance and detail parts? So on my Malibu I have headers and a column mounted tac ( Not a Sun Tac yet)Along with a bigger carb and a aluminum intake. Would it be considered day 2? even though I wouldn't call it that cause to me the parts aren't that old just have a original look to them.
__________________
1982 Pontiac Grand Prix- Dove Gray (Turbo LS swap in the works!) 1967 Chevelle SS396- Tuxedo Black- SOLD 1972 Oldsmobile 442 W29 Convertible- Sunfire Yellow- SOLD 1969 Chevrolet Chevelle/Malibu- Dover White- SOLD 1986 Oldsmobile Cutlass Supreme- Silver- SOLD 1987 Chevrolet Monte Carlo SS- Maroon- STOLEN
|
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: pxtx</div><div class="ubbcode-body">
I'm with Rick that you have to draw a line on when the old parts become too "modern" or were not available around the time the car was new. I personally feel the line should be drawn a the 2 year mark. So that is my criteria, but if you used it around here- you would still be confused as it clearly has a different meaning to others. </div></div> Paul, what happens to a guy who has a 64 GTO that builds it circa 1970? Under your criteria it is not Day 2 because the parts were made 6 years after the car was made. I think most guys who are into Day 2 mod's want to build a car from the time period they liked the cars or had their first car. For me personally it goes from about 1974 to 1977. I personally consider anything Day 2 at this point that has vintage speed parts from the 65-75 era and that is rolling as I get older. One guy might like his 67 Camaro to be 1967-68 era correct with chrome reverse wheels , another 1970 time frame with Cragars and another 1974 when he graduated from HS with aluminum slots. The most important thing with Day 2 is to be uniform and correct. A modern chrome Autometer tach on the column is not Day 2 but a correct Sun, SW or early Autometer is. What I mean by uniform is pick an era and stick with it. Don't stick early 60's Radir (Rader) wheels on a Camaro along with early 70's equipment. And to be honest I don't even like the term Day 2 but I have yet to see another term that accurately portrays the era. I'm also seriously thinking about starting my pet peeve day 2 trends also. |
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: whitetop</div><div class="ubbcode-body"><div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: pxtx</div><div class="ubbcode-body">
I'm with Rick that you have to draw a line on when the old parts become too "modern" or were not available around the time the car was new. <span style="font-weight: bold">I personally feel the line should be drawn a the 2 year mark.</span> So that is my criteria, but if you used it around here- you would still be confused as it clearly has a different meaning to others. </div></div> <span style="text-decoration: underline">And to be honest I don't even like the term Day 2 but I have yet to see another term that accurately portrays the era.</span> </div></div> Well, in that case I guess I can't run my Mickey Thompsons on my '62 anymore because they were made in '65. [img]<<GRAEMLIN_URL>>/frown.gif[/img] [img]<<GRAEMLIN_URL>>/dunno.gif[/img] If you don't like "Day-2", then just call them "Warranty Delete" cars! [img]<<GRAEMLIN_URL>>/naughty.gif[/img] Verne |
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Verne_Frantz</div><div class="ubbcode-body"><div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: whitetop</div><div class="ubbcode-body"><div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: pxtx</div><div class="ubbcode-body">
I'm with Rick that you have to draw a line on when the old parts become too "modern" or were not available around the time the car was new. <span style="font-weight: bold">I personally feel the line should be drawn a the 2 year mark.</span> So that is my criteria, but if you used it around here- you would still be confused as it clearly has a different meaning to others. </div></div> <span style="text-decoration: underline">And to be honest I don't even like the term Day 2 but I have yet to see another term that accurately portrays the era.</span> </div></div> Well, in that case I guess I can't run my Mickey Thompsons on my '62 anymore because they were made in '65. [img]<<GRAEMLIN_URL>>/frown.gif[/img] [img]<<GRAEMLIN_URL>>/dunno.gif[/img] If you don't like "Day-2", then just call them "Warranty Delete" cars! [img]<<GRAEMLIN_URL>>/naughty.gif[/img] Verne </div></div> Hey Verne, Keep the Thompsons on it, it's a Day 3 car!!
__________________
Tommy's Toy 1959 Pontiac Catalina 420a / 3 speed manual 1960 Pontiac Ventura 4 speed 1961 Pontiac Catalina 4 speed 1961 Pontiac Ventura 425a / 4 speed 1962 Chevrolet Corvette 1963 Pontiac Catalina 421/4 speed 1964 Pontiac Catalina 2+2 tri power/4 speed |
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
|
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Tommy Nolen</div><div class="ubbcode-body"><div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Verne_Frantz</div><div class="ubbcode-body"><div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: whitetop</div><div class="ubbcode-body"><div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: pxtx</div><div class="ubbcode-body">
I'm with Rick that you have to draw a line on when the old parts become too "modern" or were not available around the time the car was new. <span style="font-weight: bold">I personally feel the line should be drawn a the 2 year mark.</span> So that is my criteria, but if you used it around here- you would still be confused as it clearly has a different meaning to others. </div></div> <span style="text-decoration: underline">And to be honest I don't even like the term Day 2 but I have yet to see another term that accurately portrays the era.</span> </div></div> Well, in that case I guess I can't run my Mickey Thompsons on my '62 anymore because they were made in '65. [img]<<GRAEMLIN_URL>>/frown.gif[/img] [img]<<GRAEMLIN_URL>>/dunno.gif[/img] If you don't like "Day-2", then just call them "Warranty Delete" cars! [img]<<GRAEMLIN_URL>>/naughty.gif[/img] Verne </div></div> Hey Verne, Keep the Thompsons on it, it's a Day 3 car!! </div></div> Well, I guess I own 2 Day-3 cars then because my other '62 has these ETs on it which also came out in '65. Verne [img]<<GRAEMLIN_URL>>/blush.gif[/img] 22 years after that photo was taken, after I bought the car and washed it. |
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
|
You are in like flint Verne!
|
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
|
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: whitetop</div><div class="ubbcode-body">
And to be honest I don't even like the term Day 2 but I have yet to see another term that accurately portrays the era. </div></div> Period Correct Mods. Paul |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|