Go Back   The Supercar Registry > General Discussion > Supercar/Musclecar Discussion


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 02-26-2009, 02:33 AM
x  Baldwin  Motion's Avatar
x Baldwin Motion x  Baldwin  Motion is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: 41N 72 18.5W Sag Harbor NY
Posts: 6,644
Thanks: 226
Thanked 193 Times in 72 Posts
Default Re: looks are deceiving L-71

Reserve has been met at $29,000.00 is it not worth that much???!!
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 02-26-2009, 02:41 AM
olredalert olredalert is offline
Yenko Contributing Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Marine City, Mi.
Posts: 9,617
Thanks: 34,860
Thanked 4,843 Times in 2,037 Posts
Default Re: looks are deceiving L-71

------In the $29,000 area the car is fairly priced unless the frame is rusted out. You could fluff a lot of small stuff and still be on the money. I did notice it has headers, I think, but even thats not that big a deal.
------Im curious, Chris, how did you get that shot of the pad. Its a good one!.......Bill S
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 02-26-2009, 02:46 AM
Charley Lillard Charley Lillard is offline
Yenko Contributing Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: Woodland, ca. US
Posts: 16,113
Thanks: 559
Thanked 5,375 Times in 1,315 Posts
Default Re: looks are deceiving L-71

Great pic of the pad. You can even see where the stamp bounced.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 02-26-2009, 03:02 AM
x  Baldwin  Motion's Avatar
x Baldwin Motion x  Baldwin  Motion is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: 41N 72 18.5W Sag Harbor NY
Posts: 6,644
Thanks: 226
Thanked 193 Times in 72 Posts
Default Re: looks are deceiving L-71

[image][/image]

Has a factory mishap like this been documented before?
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 02-26-2009, 09:29 PM
Wardy Wardy is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: PA
Posts: 37
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default Re: looks are deceiving L-71

[ QUOTE ]
------In the $29,000 area the car is fairly priced unless the frame is rusted out. You could fluff a lot of small stuff and still be on the money. I did notice it has headers, I think, but even thats not that big a deal.
------Im curious, Chris, how did you get that shot of the pad. Its a good one!.......Bill S

[/ QUOTE ]
The seller linked to a photobucket acct in the ebay ad. I figured it was ok to post the pic if they linked to it on ebay.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 02-26-2009, 10:21 PM
Charley Lillard Charley Lillard is offline
Yenko Contributing Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: Woodland, ca. US
Posts: 16,113
Thanks: 559
Thanked 5,375 Times in 1,315 Posts
Default Re: looks are deceiving L-71

I like the engine pad but I am not up on similar dated pads to see if they used 0 and O on similar. Someone must have some close built engines in their data base. TimG where are you ?
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 02-27-2009, 05:11 AM
Fast67VelleN2O's Avatar
Fast67VelleN2O Fast67VelleN2O is offline
Yenko Contributing Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Mullica Hill, NJ
Posts: 4,114
Thanks: 7
Thanked 188 Times in 94 Posts
Default Re: looks are deceiving L-71

The car looks pretty legit to me... Don't know why someone would restamp a car that hasn't been restored and has had headers installed at some point.
__________________
Day 2 is Life.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 02-27-2009, 07:29 PM
TimG TimG is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 4,631
Thanks: 1
Thanked 2,730 Times in 1,055 Posts
Default Re: looks are deceiving L-71

I don't have a problem with the "O's" or even the inverted "8", I've got plenty of examples of those in my files. The over stamp is a bit unusual and pretty messy. I'd look real hard for 435 signs on this car. No pictures of the tach, oil pressure gauge, four bolt main (big oil cooler plug), or transistor ignition stuff.
These would help verify its 435 heritage. Could it be a 390 horse motor with an over stamp from the factory? Could it have been over stamped later in life? I don't know. Too bad they had to pull the motor and rebuild it, with a strange stamp and no paperwork, you'd love to see the motor in its original, never removed condition. They should have documented the motor before removal if nothing else.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 02-28-2009, 07:06 AM
Pat O'Connell Pat O'Connell is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Detroit
Posts: 96
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default Re: looks are deceiving L-71

Excellent points, Tim..I'd question the seller as to why the engine was pulled for a rebuild...From the description, it didn't need much once it was torn down.
__________________
Pat O'Connell

Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 07:02 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.

O Garage vBulletin Plugins by Drive Thru Online, Inc.